Right, that’s the idea. It’s the wild west over there in OOT now, I don’t even see why anybody would want to squabble here.
I’m doing this forum a favor. I should have some honorary badge.
I’m still going to respond to Ikes however, after that thing is fully digested, because I don’t think he understands the idea. The meta is interesting. I’ll use analogies and hypotheticals because those have never been unsuccessful in conveying an idea in the history of discourse.
1 Like
this seems reasonable, but it also seems like you’re quoting the wrong guy.
and also, mentioning slow poster express in the note is out of place as far as these things go
Please don’t bring squabbles from 2+2 to Unstuck or Slow Pony Express.
1 Like
6ix is the one posting about it currently so I quoted his post to reference it.
I have no way of confirming who Einstein2 or SisterFister on 2+2 are so I have no way of directing a post at those users here.
The reason I mentioned SPE is because users from there, 2+2, and NMNM are using UP as some kind of dumb slapfight battle arena and it would be nice if they could like…not do that.
I’m open to workshopping the exact phrasing of the message.
on the change. appreciate you considering it so quickly
Mod note - discussion of old drama/moderation issues moved to appropriate thread. If you wish to continue that discussion, please do so there.
Uh, so, if doxxers just get to come back after a week and be in good standing, I guess I’m out for good.
1 Like
What’s a little bit of light doxxing among friends?
Maybe tough since you can’t just copy/paste, but can you be more specific about the doxxing?
I take it you’ll be quitting SPE too, due to this principled stance against doxxers
5 Likes
AQ’s name in their profile was changed to
[Full name] is [old username] AKA commonwealth
Pretty obvious violation of rule 6 as voted on eons ago
No threats. This includes threats of violence, exposing personal information or harassment. Any post that expresses a direct, indirect, or veiled threat to anyone - whether it be another member, some other individual, or a group in general–or an incitement to violence–will be dealt with severely, may result in an immediate permanent banning, and may be reported to the appropriate law enforcement agency.
is the issue that his name was there at all (allegedly) or was there and connected to the online persona he’s been using for more than a decade?
it’s lolpoker, but cuse is a public figure who’s been on the teevee and whose name easily discoverable in a number of poker databases. he gleefully had a (former) member of this community live stream his appearance at a final table while we all rooted him on. the Streisand effect is real
3 Likes
Ty
I’d assume all this is due to me not cuse being doxxed by the same person last night, and then someone finding out he doxxed cuse in his profile too. I don’t want my real name googlable from posts here which happened yesterday.
How about just don’t be dicks? Or put people you don’t like on ignore? Its not that hard to not be a dick. There’s many days I am successfully not a dick.
12 Likes
Ok. Great knowing you and great modding. Thank you for your service.
1 Like
Not to be that guy, but this isn’t clear grammatically that it is referring to doxxing, or just threats of doxxing. I assume it is intended to mean:
This includes:
- threats of violence
- exposing personal information
- harassment
Rather than:
This includes threats of:
- violence
- exposing personal information
- harassment
(Obviously doxxing is bad if threats of doxxing are bad, just making a stupid nitty point.)
Where we draw the line with public figures, what constitutes a public figure, etc, is probably a separate question. My personal opinion is that since cuse prefers not to have his IRL name associated with that screen name on this site we should honor that under the “don’t be dicks” rule.
1 Like
that’s not what’s in ota’s note above (edit: or Johnny’s note either). this seems entirely about cuse.
you can’t ignore a mod (lol at cuse still being a mod btw, but that’s a different issue i guess).
but more importantly, can you really not see why the “no dick” rule of common courtesy might not be extended to this one guy in this one situation considering what he’s directly responsible for in the forum?
2 Likes
I think it’s obviously the linking of the screen name to the real life information. That seems like clear doxxing to me. And, imo, I don’t think it’s relevant how many breadcrumbs the user might have left that would enable someone else to make that connection, particularly when the user in question has made it clear that they do not want that connection made publicly. In the CW case, admittedly, it was a large trail of breadcrumbs with the FT event. But I’ve certainly left enough personal tidbits around here to link my username to my real identity, and I’d still want someone banned if they started posting “spidercrab is XYZ ABCD who works at JKLKM” out of sheer malice.
6 Likes