About Moderation

I was asked by another mod to go back and read the thread to better understand the context and apply consistent moderation after the initial one I gave, so I did.

I’m never going to be able to finish without at least a few more bans

3 Likes

Banz a make her dance :dancer:

And your solution was to ban me for a post I immediately deleted specifically because I decided not to get involved, while still admitting you hadn’t read any of the context? You’re actively making this place worse and are too dumb and/or narcissistic to see it. Make my ban a 2-week perma cool down, please.

1 Like

This help at all?

1668829551783

2 Likes

You should stop banning for “old drama” after @econophile gave the ok during today’s discussion.

Econophile’s post was specifically referring to discussion about whether or not Victor should be reinstated, and the background of that. The posts in question had nothing to do with that whatsoever. The last 100 posts in this thread were a fucking dumpster fire.

Jal’s post was on topic.

This is your warning for personal attacks.

It really wasn’t though. In the legal field, we call that “attenuation.”

It really was though.

We will just have to agree to disagree then. Anyway, have a good night, it’s late, I’m going to bed.

Disagree if you want, no problem. People can read and easily see there was a concise on-topic conversation between jal and econo. Perhaps even the banning mod will read it.

1 Like

Agreed. Someone must be punished.

2 Likes

You’ll be missed. Hope you reconsider.

6 Likes

Looks like the Thanksgiving Yamnesty program (man I wish I thought of that yesterday) ended a little early. Hope everyone enjoyed it. We are now back to your regularly scheduled modding.

5 Likes

200w

1 Like

This reply to Jman was in the context of some of the hasty bans yesterday. Jmakin’s post was also on topic and should have fallen under the thanksgiving yamnesty.

“I needed to bring up/troll about drama from years ago because it supports my argument about this other narrow issue we are discussing.” Except, no, the other issue from years ago that was brought up was just backdoored in to get a rise.

It looks like the posts by Jalfrezi and jmakin were both part of a discussion that I invited users to have about audit_the_audit’s ban. To encourage open discussion, I offered an exemption from the “old drama” rule. I will discuss with commonwealth.