Who will run in 2020?

[6ix]

@boredsocial

He’s for truing them up so that they don’t lose ground to the VAT tax. 1000 a month without any restrictions is quite a bit better than what most people on assistance get today.

Do you have any lived experience with being poor enough to get any kind of welfare? It’s pretty obvious from the answer is no from where I’m sitting.

batair/nobody is a lower class hero

[6ix]

@nobody

Ive been dirt poor and gotten assistance before…im still right now on the lower end of the spectrum. There is no way a mom and a few kids could live off a thousand a month.

No wonder reps like him…

When do you start getting the benefit at eighteen? If someone chooses it can they change their mind and get other assistance?

literally the next post and i still found a way to grunch

[6ix]

@nonfiction

@boredsocial

@wheatrich

eh, nobody in this field has near the level of obama’s charisma

Agree to disagree. I think Warren, Pete, and Yang all have the same level of charisma as Obama. I think we tend to put people who have already won on a pedestal. Obama is charismatic but it’s not as freakish as people act like it is.

This might be the hottest take in the history of post-2+2 politics

Let me be clear: that take was glowing.

[simplicitus]

https://twitter.com/jbouie/status/1167400481905356800?s=19

[anon92450360]

God damn Tim Robbins’ mom is annoying af

https://twitter.com/soledadobrien/status/1167223769498345472?s=21

[boredsocial]

The anti-war people deserve a better standard bearer than Tulsi. As a country we really need to get out of the military intervention business, and I don’t think that’s going to be possible with our current military. It’s just too easy to ‘solve problems’ in foreign countries with military force.

[Riverman]

Soledad might be my #1 twitter follow. She never misses.

[Trolly]

@boredsocial

The anti-war people deserve a better standard bearer than Tulsi. As a country we really need to get out of the military intervention business, and I don’t think that’s going to be possible with our current military. It’s just too easy to ‘solve problems’ in foreign countries with military force.

Part of the reason people like Tulsi and the Paul family get so much traction is that the Dems gave up completely on being any kind of anti-war party and embraced nearly all of W’s post-9/11 War on Terror garbage. There’s an enormous need for an anti-militarism voice and only the loony tunes politicians are going after it because establishment Dems are the most incompetent political party in world history.

[otatop]

@smrk4

I’m not that worried if Biden wins, all the current evidence is still that he’s the best bet to beat stable

Kerry, Edwards Lead Bush by Double Digits Among Likely Voters

[microbet]

@Trolly

There’s an enormous need for an anti-militarism voice and only the loony tunes politicians are going after it because establishment Dems are the most incompetent political party in world history.

This one is complicity rather than incompetence.

[nunnehi]

GJGE Joe. They might have a slot available for you at 11pm ET on MSNBC soon.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/factcheck/as-he-campaigns-for-president-joe-biden-tells-a-moving-but-false-war-story/ar-AAGvWWS

[microbet]

I’m not one to bash people on age, and some really old people are still sharp as hell, but it looks like about an 75% the next POTUS will be showing very clear signs of dementia before the election.

[Lawnmower_Man]

Every single one of these candidates is trash. Warren the least so, Biden the most so. #sorrynotsorry

[LikeClockwork]

As long as you end up voting voting for one of them that’s a completely acceptable line to take.

[boredsocial]

And everyone said my completely opposite take was hot.

[boredsocial]

I’ve seen some thin attacks in my life… this is one of the thinnest.

How about you follow your candidates line and leave his extremely good friend Elizabeth alone? The standard you’re using eliminates virtually everyone who has conventionally successful family members.

And it makes no sense with Warren’s line either. She’s literally running on ruining the health insurance industry.

Bottom line though is that your post is terrible and you should delete it if you want to be taken seriously by anyone on this forum. If you want to attack Warren that’s fine, but do a better job of it.

Let me help you. Elizabeth Warren completely botched the Native American ancestry thing and could theoretically choke in a similarly large way vs Trump. She’s also a woman and do we really want to roll the dice on American NOT being sexist after 2016 (I realize this point is sexist and stupid… still less stupid than Victors). Elizabeth Warren looks and sounds like a school teacher and won’t be as entertaining to watch as Donald so the media might throw it to him again (also a dumb take but still better IMO).

There’s lots and lots of better lines. Be better.

[PabloHoney]

Imagine thinking takes straight from Chapo or wayofthebern have any merit and worth repeating.
Only hapless idiots, shills and trolls care.

[zikzak]

That Warren attack isn’t even accurate from what I can find. The company her daughter co-founded isn’t an insurance company, it’s a network for healthcare discounts.

This is it, I believe (security warning for bad certificate, safe to ignore imo):

https://www.healthallies.com/content/aarp/en/public/faqs-help.html

[Riverman]

Lol victor pretty much covers it here folks

[Lawnmower_Man]

There are no amazing candidates. The voting is rigged, the courts are rigged, the funding is rigged. How many candidates will push these recently-discovered awesome powers of the presidency to kill the cancer? None of them. You’d need a complete psycho.