Because the graph with the candidates was bullshit.
I went from Warren stan to BernieBro, so I guess Iâve been radicalized.
I got where Bernieâs dot is. On this board that means Iâm far right.
About what I expected⌠I thought Iâd be more liberal on the authoritarian/libertarian scale and more moderate on the left/right scale.
Youâre a Euro.
I went to my first protest so long ago that Bernie was in his early 40s!
His early 140s?
High score?
To be fair there were a few that I felt too uninformed to give a good answer. Like, maybe there are wars in violation of international law that are good? I donât know enough about international law.
Câmon! You were aiming for that!
When I was less than fully certain I didnât pick âstronglyâ!
In violation of international law, even.
Amen. I wish Pete would stop attacking other Democratic candidates using Republican talking points.
Seems Iâm pretty boring and not high-score-ish
We are not on the same team.
Establishment centrist Dems are closer to being on the same team as Republicans than they are to being on the side of people who believe in true liberal progressive policies. It is there existence that allows Republicans to remain in power. Itâs unfortunate that you donât see how much damage Peteâs campaign has already done.
And he did it knowing it was wrong, but he went down this path because he decided that carving out a lane for him personally to improve his chances of winning was more important than positive progressive change for our country.
Harriot had it right. Pete cares more about being something than changing anything.
The tweet isnât about Pete but it might as well be.
Goddamn, I thought I was the only OâMalley stan on this forum. Dude would have absolutely demolished Trump.
JFC, just watch Hillary and CBS News give him the stink-eye as he calls for being more humane toward Syrian refugees --way back in 2015, well before Trumpâs internment camps.
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/martin-omalley-weighs-in-on-the-controversial-refugee-debate/