Who will run in 2020?

My point is if something simple like a functioning website can take 6 months then the entire process will take considerably more than 2 years.

I mean thatā€™s the whole reason why you use the Medicare system. The infrastructure is already there.

2 Likes

There are currently 60 million people enrolled in Medicare or Medicare Advantage. You will have almost 6 times that many under Medicare for All. You will probably need to rebuilt the whole infrastructure from the ground up.

The virtue of M4A is simplicity. I went to the NHS last time I was in England. I didnā€™t need to visit websites or fill out extensive paperwork, because itā€™s free to everyone. That said I agree people are in general painting a rosy picture of M4A and how easy everything will be under it.

1 Like

This is ridiculous.

1 Like

Couldnā€™t

2 Likes

Skydiver is getting shit on because her candidateā€™s fantasyland plan that will never become law in a million years isnā€™t as good as the boardā€™s chosen candidateā€™s fantasyland plan that will also never become law in a million years.

3 Likes

This seems like a dumb reason for all the rage thatā€™s going on here. Yā€™all need to take a step back and dial it down.

Ugh I really hate how effective this talking point is. But it is.

Iā€™ve been a plan admin for health plans from Florida BC/BS since early 2016 and I can tell you unequivocally that their Web site has never worked correctly in that time. It is so bad that we have recently been forced to revert to the ancient practice of Calling Customer Service just to pay our monthly premiums. Whatā€™s worse, they seem wholly uninterested in getting the bugs out of the site or really in helping us in any way. (They know that we have a grandfathered pre-ACA plan and wonā€™t switch because of costā€¦not sure if that actually factors into their thinking or if they are just shitty for a different reason.)

From my vantage point I can see no more accountability in the private sector than in the public sector, except I can still help vote out the public sector.

So single payer healthcare might be a fantasy in the 2020-2024 term. Fighting for it and losing is basically fine with me. We then name, shame, primary, and replace every single politician who fought itā€¦ and win the next time.

Expecting the current system to keep going business as usual simply isnā€™t viable, and when the rubber finally hits the road and this country finds itself in a real crisis and needs to find money that 6% of GDP weā€™ve been wasting is going to be the first low hanging fruit we pick. We need to lay the groundwork for that to happen ASAP.

Pete is getting clobbered ITT for spouting health insurance lobby talking points everywhere. Youā€™re allowed to ā€˜disagreeā€™ with single payer (although Iā€™m virtually certain Pete knows enough about healthcare and economics to know better), but youā€™re not allowed to make bogus arguments about the cost of it. Itā€™s cheaper than what we have now full stop. That talking point is equivalent to casting doubt on whether cigarettes cause cancer. Itā€™s cynical in a super toxic way and it should be disqualifying.

There was a time when a ā€˜public optionā€™ that helped control costs would have been enough. That time was the 2008-2012 term. That time has passed and the healthcare system has become even more expensive since then. Now the average American has pretty crappy health insurance and pays an awful lot in premiums, and basically nobody but the top 10% of the population is happy with their health insurance. They are woefully out of touch about this and now the question is when, not if, single payer gets done.

I certainly agree the odds are stacked against it for 2020-2022, and probably for 2022-2024.

Bottom line though: We have to start thinking longer term than just the very next election cycle. Thatā€™s how weā€™ll get better results than the Baby Boomers have.

5 Likes

One person is being kind of hostile, but it seems more like Pete is being ganged-up on and not skydiver8. At least I hope Iā€™m not being a dick.

I understand her being sensitive about it though and sheā€™s so involved and identified with Mayor Peteā€™s campaign.

I was a dick to her. Not sure whether I regret it. Weā€™re dicks to people often, look at how Keed and Nunnehi get treated when they post lolbad takes. Skydiver is not being honest, and thatā€™s a really shitty way to approach discussions. At some point I no longer treat it as a respectful disagreement and begin treating it like intentional disinformation.

2 Likes

I mean skydiver8 has decided to stan for Pete no matter what he does and defend him against all comers. If sheā€™s been attacked thatā€™s why.

My feelings about Pete havenā€™t been changed in the slightest and I think heā€™s already done some really awful stuff in contributing to establishment attacks on Warren over the cost of single payer. Heā€™s gone from being my 3rd place choice with a huge gap between 3rd and 4th to being one slot above Biden at the absolute bottom of the pile.

I have no idea how far heā€™d have to go to lose skydivers support but Iā€™m guessing weā€™d be talking about stuff you could get indicted for. It clearly isnā€™t being a generally shitty person.

1 Like

Keeed trolls. I donā€™t know exactly how to describe his flavor of trolling (there should be like 50 words for different types of trolling). Nunnehi is one of the most abusive people on the forum. skydiver8 isnā€™t doing anything other than supporting Pete. Iā€™ve not followed well enough to know if sheā€™s misrepresenting things, but Iā€™m skeptical that itā€™s really been out of line.

1 Like

Itā€™s hard to not be dishonest when your candidate is being dishonest I suspect. Sheā€™s fighting the good fight.

Did Warren ever come out with her healthcare plan? If I was a betting man (I am actually) I would guess it will be a transition to single payer and probably not at a pace people on this forum will agree with.

The fact that you claim to be in agreement.

Hey guys, just a concerned citizen here letting you know that even though your liberal plan would be better than everything else, you shouldnā€™t run on it, you should run on something watered down that the American people will like more.

Nah, sorry. Weā€™ve heard that bullshit before - doesnā€™t matter much whether itā€™s coming from a right winger, a moderate, or a Chicken Little Liberal.

I donā€™t give a fuck. The majority of pundits thought Trump couldnā€™t win, Hillary was the best candidate to beat him, Biden is the best candidate to beat him now, etc, etcā€¦ Most of the ā€œpunditsā€ are bought and paid for by corporate interests.

Itā€™s the smart move, the rest is about messaging and strategy. People donā€™t want to be bullshitted, and they want things fixed. You can craft a poll to make single payer popular, you can craft one to make it unpopular. Conclusion? Message on the popular parts, make it popular.

Right, so this doesnā€™t impact you, hence youā€™re not that concerned about getting the best policy through.

Yeah, there are a lot of people who have good insurance relative to the average American, and donā€™t realize thatā€™s still worse than M4A.

3 Likes

And many people who think that they have ā€œgood insuranceā€ just means they havenā€™t been hard-core fucked over yet.

3 Likes

Iā€™ve never heard anyone say anything about the pace. Who ever said it was going to be easy and happen overnight? But thereā€™s a big difference between actually moving things in a direction with an end goal vs. taking a step that may lead that way if thatā€™s what the market decides.

2 Likes

This is the kind of compromise Iā€™d be ok with though. At least itā€™s a concrete transition plan. Not ā€œletā€™s do this other, shittier, plan and hope that people like it enough that we can have the single payer debate again in 10 years and see what happensā€

4 Likes