Who will run in 2020?

I respect anyone willing to put in the work and back a candidate they believe in. I spent a lot of time working for Obama for free and found it to be very rewarding. I still remember the scene at the Ohio Headquarters when he won in ‘08.

That said, people like Pete need to be chased from the party. If “winning” means a Public Option Brought To You By United Health and Pfizer, no thanks. Pete is exactly why these soulless corporate ghouls buy politicians of both parties - because it works.

Hard pass on anyone who doesn’t see the need to blow the whole damn thing up or is unwilling to do so.

4 Likes

do you know how utterly ridiculous this is?

Where would he go? Where would I go? where would the millions of people who don’t want to burn it all down but also don’t agree with republicans go? A third party? You know what that would do.

Completely fucking delusional.

1 Like

He’s a fucking republican. He literally stood up on stage and spouted HMO-approved bullshit. Nobody actually believes that shit, definitely not Pete. I don’t care where he goes, probably on the McKesson board to negotiate a friendly opioid settlement. His voters will go to Team Actually Fucking Do Something.

He’s welcome to sit on the back bench of the party and vote for the stuff that the progressive leadership puts in front of him, the same way the left wing has been relegated to voting for shitty half measures for the last few decades.

2 Likes

Absolutely no way. That would literally re-elect Trump. Where on earth are you getting that flaming hot pile of turd take?

And Aaron shall cast lots upon the two goats: one lot for the LORD, and the other lot for the Mayor of South Bend.

2 Likes

This probably belongs in the healthcare thread, but meh. The cost-savings thing has become a meme around here, but it’s really not clear, honestly. The figure that everyone cites from the Mercatus paper was their estimate under the most favorable assumptions. Pretty good article here from the NYT. Bottom-line graph:

image

Note that Urban Institute, who have the highest cost estimate, are a left-leaning think tank:

The Urban Institute has been referred to as “independent” and as “liberal”. A 2005 study of media bias in The Quarterly Journal of Economics ranked UI as the 11th most liberal of the 50 most-cited think tanks and policy groups, placing it between the NAACP and the People for Ethical Treatment of Animals.

Nobody really knows what the costs would be, it’s complicated. The point is that they are comparable and for that you get comprehensive coverage for everyone with healthcare as a human right.

2 Likes

The costs are easy to control once the government is the only buyer.

I mean you can just assert that, but the government is the only buyer of military equipment, would you characterise the costs for military hardware as “easy to control”?

I’m for M4A, don’t get me wrong, but I’m probably going to go with the estimates from people who have tried to model how it would work over armchair “ez game” arguments.

5 Likes

I was being sarcastic but I saw a few randoms post that on twitter saying “bernie will need Tulsi’s supporters”.

1 Like

The “modeling” is absolute nonsense. You can argue “the obvious solution is politically unlikely,” but it’s still the obvious solution.

1 Like

I could see Bernie losing support from the Tulsi tweet though. I believe it was a calculated move by the establishment.

8 Likes

Caption stolen from Twitter: “get in, we’re going to the bad place”

2 Likes

That cannot be real.

That’s the ole dan rather fake but accurate imo

Edit: holy shit it’s real

1 Like

of course it’s real. It’s the first time they met, actually. Zuck came to South Bend in 2017 to look for places to do philanthropic work. no idea what came of it. Pete is a mayor, who was looking out for opportunities for his city.

He also had to work with Pence, but we know how he feels about that.

Did he gleefully take selfies with Pence too?

image

Also, pretty sure zuckerberg took all the pictures but who knows.