Video Games

I have played both CK2 and EU4 and found the latter much harder to get into. It has so many mechanics that are poorly or not explained at all.

Whether playing as Portugal or England the pro move is to leave that alliance immediately.

The wiki and especially Reddit are great resources, but if you have questions about specific countries just post them here, many of us have 1000+ hours played and can answer them.

This is good advice. Castile/France/ottomans are all good choices for starter countries imo. Muscovy is also fun although Iā€™ve never played it as a beginner so I canā€™t actually guesstimate difficulty.

1 Like

Muscovy is the easiest one to form Russia. Novgorod is supposedly a fun challenge but I havenā€™t done it yet.

But like, how are you supposed to know that?

a lot of people look for expert strategy guides online but i just love to play the game. i donā€™t try to glitch the game and take over the world with ryuku, i just enjoy guiding a nation through 400 years of alternate history

I tried castille and even then I get rolled if I try to attack granada.

I managed to have a more successful start with castille, allying with France and Portugal, which was a mistake because Portugal allies with England and france/england immediately get into a war within the first few years of the game.

So that led to an all out brawl with portugal, which I managed to win and cripple them pretty badly. France picked up the peace treaty and all the money though.

Then I invaded granada and grabbed just one province but it took 618 days and a lot of men. I feel like Iā€™m making mistakes but the game isnā€™t really giving me feedback on what they are.

Iā€™ll continue with castille but I just get the feeling Iā€™m gonna get ROFLstomped again at some point by like 40k english soldiers invading me for no reason at all. However, I am learning in these early conflicts england does not seem to win them at all so allying with France has been more convenient. They wiped out some rebels for me already.

One thing Iā€™m generally clueless about is how to make more money other than through conquest + taxation. Trade is kind of mystifying to me at this point. Oh well. Cool game but I am not sure Iā€™ll be able to invest the time into it because itā€™s not great at giving clear direction.

I should try this game sometime. I used to play a whole lot of Total War back in the day.

1 Like

Thereā€™s really a ton of good info out on the Web you can use to git gud. The game has been around since 2013 so the info available is voluminous. Any question you have has probably already been answered 5 different ways.

As to the specific problem of attacking Granada, I didnā€™t really kick off the Reconquista until after the Iberian Wedding fired (Iberian Wedding is a historical event where Ferdinand and Isabella (or some other people) marry and Castile and Aragon form a PU, which is even better if Aragon manages to keep Naples under personal union because you get their help too. That event can fire as early as 1450 if their rulers have different genders or are in regency iirc). https://eu4.paradoxwikis.com/Spanish_events

Once that happens your resources increase significantly, and even if you canā€™t raise armies you can take out loans and hire enough mercs to smoke them fairly quickly. Just donā€™t wait too long, otherwise they will ally with north African nations or worse even Ottomans and theyā€™ll be a bitch to get rid of and you need those provinces to form Spain.

Donā€™t worry about England they are too far away to concern you. Just donā€™t try to go toe to toe with their navy, because they will wreck your Spanish Armada just like they did irl. Spain really is a very powerful nation to play once formed. They have great ideas and mission trees.

Goofy is also correct wrt Ottomans, theyā€™re probably in the best shape of any other single nation at the start of the game. They just won the battle of Varna and crippled eastern europe and the way forward is wide open. Or you can avoid the euros and push east. Lots and lots of options.

You make money through conquest but thatā€™s only part of it. Itā€™s important to control the good provinces that have higher development, and also ones that have estuaries and trade nodes and gold mines (rare) when possible. As for how trade works, many veterans donā€™t fully understand it and I count myself as one of those. Here is a good youtube on it that explains it in depth though it bugs me he mispronounces ā€œGenoaā€

Siu King has a great youtube channel with a ton of info and he also streams the game.

Also donā€™t be afraid to restart if things go south for you early on, no shame in it weā€™ve all done it.

1 Like

You should invest the time. Itā€™s worth it. This is a pretty good beginners letā€™s play by a fairly well known/respected eu4 youtuber.

Itā€™s from 2016 but itā€™s not so far out of date that it doesnā€™t do a decent job of explaining the basics well enough.

The only really big mechanics they added since then that I recall are army professionalism (you get it by hiring generals and drilling armies) and buying development for mana. Iā€™m fairly confident I could play an entire game in a valid way without doing either.

1 Like

Reduce military spending to 0/near 0 when at peace and turn off fort maintenance. These eat huge unnecessary amounts of money in your monthly budget. Only increase when you have rebels or are about to declare war. Use this extra space in your budget to max your army up to your force limit. Wars become very expensive, so try to build up a warchest of funds before, but donā€™t be afraid to take loans.

1 Like

Oh and for godā€™s sake DONā€™T ATTACK ARAGON! If relations are bad send a diplomat to improve them. You are basically attacking yourself if you do that.

1 Like

If youā€™re thinking about it, Iā€™d do it now before the sale ends

Yeah Quill does great tutorials for strat games

I started the game with aragon already rivaling me. My understanding this isnā€™t always the case? Thanks for the writeup. Maybe we should have a separate EU4 thread ? This looks like a game with the depth I always wanted out of civ games ( I know itā€™s not civ but what I really wanted from civ all along was this game, I think).

Always looked a little too complex for me but Iā€™m unemployed and have a lot of free time now. I will look at that letā€™s play.

Iā€™m gonna reroll with castille and focus on just building my armies and staying the fuck out of england/france bullshit.

1 Like

So, it seems to be that Iā€™m going to be stuck at Stanford for at least 6 weeks M-F, getting treatment about 2-3 hours a day - but otherwise, Iā€™m going to be sitting on my butt killing time in a hotel room - Iā€™ve seen a fair amount of this EU4 discussion - good way to give it a shot? Iā€™m not really in the mood for any shoot-em-up/zombie slasher type of games at present. Or any other thoughts? Iā€™m guessing that between a mediocre laptop and hotel type wifi access, I may run into some programs that wonā€™t run well - but I was hoping a strategy type of thing might pass the time. Any suggestions appreciated.

thanks

MM MD

1 Like

Crusader Kings in depth Europe 1066-1366

Europa Univeralis in depth Europe 1492-1792

Or if you just want a more global game, with a lot of depth, find the most recent civilization game your computer can run

Aragon rivalling you doesnā€™t matter. You both have the same dynasty and the event where you get a personal union with them will still probably fire. I donā€™t actually understand how the marriage/dynasty stuff in EU4 really works on a deep level, but you both have the same dynasty which makes that kind of thing super likely.

1 Like

Ive never played the game but hereā€™s the link if you want it and a bunch of DLC: Humble Europa Universalis IV Bundle

If you like card games, consider giving Hearthstone a shot.