The cough at the end of that first one, lol.
āWe had a super spreader event in the White House,ā Fauci told CBS News Radio on Friday. āIt was in a situation where people were crowded together, were not wearing masks. So the data speak for themselves.ā
Always suspected Fauci was a plural data guy
So baby mussolini didnāt tweet all morning, belted out 18 minutes from his balcony, tweeted twice, then went back to nappies?
It was only 18 minutes? Damn thatās wicked short for him
It was supposed to be 30. Heās going to try to do a rally on Monday. BRING ME ALL THE ADDERALL
He hates his audience. Iām surprised it wasnāt 2 minutes.
Such nasty people.
If the current workload of the DC Circuit requires 11 people, Iām sure SCOTUS needs more like 13-15.
Its just that republicans simply do the things they want to ensure their victory regardless of elections.
There is zero ev to talking about court packing. Just do it when you win. You can also lie about not doing it and then do it, it makes no difference
You would have to admire his unwavering commitment to Never Apologise, Never Explain if it wasnāt so dumb. His acolyte Katie Hopkins almost went bankrupt following the same rule.
No shit? I legit didnāt know that. Does that mean, theoretically, that Nixon could have committed unlimited federal crimes without fear of prosecution, post-pardon?
My wife speculating that Dubya may endorse Biden this week based on some interview that CNN did with his cardiologist
This. Republicans are paying almost no price for completely reversing course on ACB. Biden should just say if Rās appoint ACB, heāll then consider packing, but then do it regardless.
āThe supreme court is supposed to impartially uphold the constitution. If we feel they are deviating from their intended purpose in order to usurp the will of the people, then we will use the powers granted by the constitution to address it.ā. Then add 4 justices if they ram through ACB and 2 if they donāt. Or 4 anyways, fuck it. B
Never in a million years. Dubya has too many friends running for senate that that would hurt (Ie: Collins, Susan)
Maybe thatās what Iām having trouble understanding. IANAL, so maybe itās my lack of understanding what pardon means. I was under the impression that pardons worked for crimes where you had been charged and either convicted or pled guilty. I just find it odd to be pardoned for something youāve never been charged with in the first place.