The Presidency of Donald J. Trump, Episode VI: No Witnesses, One Defector, No Checks or Balances

I can see why this could look bad but it also makes sense in the context of a deal like this where each nations interests effect the other two. It’s basically meant to address externalities.

1 Like

And for the sake of Donald Fucking Trump

Chuck “Ché of Wallstreet” Schumer, is that for real?

IIRC, it wasn’t originally like that. I think the Goldman family got the rights to the book because of the civil suit or some shit. They changed the title to make the “If” small.

I could be wrong, but I think it’s something like that.

2 Likes

Yep. Don’t know if he doesn’t want the world to burn and wanted environmental requirements, had other reasons like this one here, or was astute politically and didn’t want to be part of giving Trump a huge victory over a relatively minor change to NAFTA - something that seriously will increase his chances of winning when the states that hated NAFTA and were key to the 2016 election are fooled into thinking this is something very different. But yeah, he’s definitely a notable vote against.

Only 3 no votes from congressional Republicans from both houses. I suppose they are notable for that, but the only one among them I recognize is Thomas Massey.

You are correct about the Goldman family acquiring the rights. For the cover, if memory serves, this was the original cover before it was recalled shortly before the original release by OJ.

Remember when Trump moved out of NY…

https://mobile.twitter.com/zackwhittaker/status/1225246196278624256
https://mobile.twitter.com/zackwhittaker/status/1225247155285372928

https://mobile.twitter.com/BlinkyMclasher/status/1225251510260551681

3 Likes

13 Likes

Every single one of these assclowns who breathlessly reported about Republicans secretly mounting a stealth rebellion on the basis of unnamed sources needs to be taken outside and paddled. Worse than useless self-absorbed clowndicks.

3 Likes

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1225284559488585729
( twitter | raw text )

Any other president just had to say ‘national security’ and they could do whatever they want.

Trump just has to say ‘fuck you’ and he can do whatever he wants.

I’m sure this will be the time the lawyers save us.

It might piss off enough wealthy to stop it though.

first he lost by 3 million, and now just lost by 18 million. still president. #democracy

Nope, because Mitts is a cuck POS who just wants status & is now trying a different tack. Fk him!

Don’t make the less worse into heroes! Fuck 'em all!

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1225288731235700737
( twitter | raw text )

Sanctimoniously. Who fed him that?

3 Likes

Your own party says you did it, they just think it’s less dangerous to remove you via election than impeachment. GG. You won. Please STFU.

What are the odds he spells a 15 letter word correctly?

1 Like

A reminder that this forum spent months begging Pelosi to do this and raging that she wouldn’t.

2 Likes

https://mobile.twitter.com/nytdavidbrooks/status/1225187715983036416

https://mobile.twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/1225198068603269125

https://mobile.twitter.com/jonathanchait/status/1225202795231444997

Jfc, Jon Chait is even dunking on Brooks.

2 Likes