The whole idea seemed bananas to me. Game design is a serious, mature business, you need something really compelling these days to make a hit indie game. Crypto dudes trying to shoehorn a game into a crpto platform and expecting it to take off seems like an absurd longshot.
I think you’d be much better off going to Blizzard and try to pitch a way to shoehorn crypto into an existing online game economy rather than come up with a hit online game from scratch.
NFTs as in game items in Blizzard games (some rare Diablo / WoW equipment) and EA Ultimate team (ultra rare player cards) already exist without the NFT part. The gold rush of people paying 6 figures for 5 lines of text (Loot) or the staking / farming 8 bit stuff is just pure nonsense.
Some guesses in the replies.
https://twitter.com/coinfessions/status/1550722384369434624?s=21&t=dxudj-YHvJQM2Tj8rzblbw
Completely off topic, but saw this in the replies. Great game, probably translates very well to a mobile platform.
https://twitter.com/dukope/status/1550895020861181952?s=20&t=HNZC8GBBlknhoHoqrmCz_Q
Now THAT is an appropriate and reasonable design for a logo incorporating an eagle with flat-topped wings!
(context)
Er, the whole point of the game is you work for a fictional Eastern European dictatorship. It’s supposed to look fascist.
“the small African nation of Uruguay” is a good hideout place if you can reach it.
That’s what I meant! Good for fictional fascists, bad for elementary schools.
Everyday I check the price…bad price!
“Small African nation of Uruguay”
Story checks out
It’s almost like this was intentional.
I agree with this.
You will only get people from poor countries to play bad games and farm coins out of desperation. And even then some of them are spending time boosting accounts on good games for $.
You can’t compete in the gaming business if you make shit games. And it takes a lot of money to produce good games now.
activision says hello.
Don’t they own the call of duty franchise?
half of it, yes, although I would argue that reinforces my point
