The group that targeted multiple posters in a deeply personal and insulting manner over the course of months? Then went off on spam and profanity tirades. Yea it was certainly disgusting
no, people you donât give a fuck about and are never even considered when doing the very strange tally of âhaha you leftâ vs âran offâ.
Sure, Iâm sympathetic to the people who misguidedly chose to back the uk bros. But the uk bros themselves treated this forum like their personal toilet. Thatâs me being as objective as I possibly can.
Itâs a parody at this point. How can these fools not see the unity offered here?
I guess the conversation has ran its course as the cool kids say.
What Iâm enjoying about this is that some folks get to hang out in the Cloister of Happiness and make time to rage here. I get it, few if any are distinguishing themselves now but the asymmetry is noteworthy.
How about this, Sabo comes back here but you have to take at least jman to the Conclave of Fraternity under the condition that he does nothing to ban Sabo over there, but should he choose, he gets to conduct himself in the same way there as the garbage weâve gotten here, deal?
3 Likes
There should really be a forum law against using âweâ (and plural you).
How can todayâs âeventsâ not make you feel the slightest bit embarrassed? I really canât imagine what will then.
Sorry, what am I supposed to be embarrassed by? All is fair in love and forum war, apparently.
I will imagine this was a genuine question and will genuinely answer -
Iâll recap quickly. Today one member of the group opened a thread about jmakin perma with a poll, asking for some context on what has happened. Some context was given by those are are familiar with the issues. (and honestly i donât believe anyone who isnât scared by the answers given)
These members were then accused of -
a) voting for jmakin ban (which they didnât)
b) voting against jmakin ban as a ruse
c) voting against jmakin bas even though they want to ban him so they wonât look hypocrite (i dunno if itâs good or bad, but it was accompanied by lol).
d) opening a thread about sabo as a troll/tit-for-tat (which they havenât)
To this team âweâ added 2 troll threads and dozens of posts about team âtheyâ in unrelated threads.
And yet somehow it appears both you and Alex came out of today being even more convinced in your prejudice. Itâs a mystery to me.
Dude this is exactly what Iâm talking about. I can freely say that Jman and CN troll and make a lot of bad posts. This isnât like some taboo thing to discuss. Yet âuk brosâ brings out the fainting couches?
Calling out people who post bad for posting bad doesnât mean I think theyâre evil or like irredeemable. All they have to literally do is post better. I donât know what the proper analogy is, maybe the paradox of tolerance.
Like the timeline is:
Team A trashes various people in team B for being fake leftists, warmongers, fascists, etc
Alex: Hey this is really fucked up
Yuv: Omg where is the unity
And then the claim that some people were more offended by âuk brosâ than by their attacks which Iâd prefer not to dig up but surely could. Thereâs definitely a parody here just not sure who is serious and who is Shirley
2 Likes
And you called them out on it and no one pushed back afaik? Do you see how this is different than the interactions that go the other way around
1 Like
And i can freely say that about lots of team ukbrosantivaxtreasonputin. Not sure why you insist on getting a medal.
Who is bringing âfainting couchesâ? All the fainting couches today were brought by jman and company.
None of what you described occurred today. So this is another case where nothing actually matters, except your preconceived notion.
Leaving aside that I didnât do a-d and do not coordinate my opinions and posts with others who may loosely agree with me, is it truly that mysterious to you that the set of facts that one might use to judge this ongoing debacle go back, say, before todayâs events? Like, you donât just get to flashy-thing over 2 years of bullshit just because today, yeah, âmy sideâ is doing the bulk of the shit posting.
This doesnât make any sense though. Why did you bother pointing this out today then, when team âweâ made the bulk of the shit posting? If even today is a good time to trash team ânot weâ, then whatâs even the point?
They arenât perma-banned, Iâm not even sure who âtheyâ are exactly. Today wasnât a day where they did anything wrong. So itâs just open season to shit on them at all times regardless of the actual content? Seems really unproductive. Maybe wait until they shitpost, it wonât take very long Iâm sure.
Iâm not sure whatâs supposed to make sense? Are you suggesting that Iâm supposed to refrain from expressing a view about the broader conflict because thereâs some waiting period Iâm supposed to observe because somebody who is not me made some bad posts today?
Well yeah to both. If none of the events that we are discussing matter, none of your posts include any new information and regardless of what happens you will post the same thing over and over itâs borderline spam. Sure you are allowed to post it but i get to point out how bad the content is. And i can do it without woofing!
Youâre really stretching. You didnât like my post, like, cool my man. No need to strain to find a logical chessmate when there isnât one. Maybe wait until an actual error happens, it wonât take very long Iâm sure.
1 Like
Yep, the discussion has ran its course. And as always ânothing really mattersâ declared the winner.
1 Like
Also I think youâre too emotional atm to see it, but that post you said contained no new information actually contained a very substantive, if modest, proposal: Sabo comes back Here, the Symposium of Kindness takes jman, fair trade?
Iâm very manly and not emotional at all.
I was trying to ignore your troll regarding jman as it shows you in a very poor light, has multiple logical errors and implies ownership over both this community and one of their members. I want to believe you only posted that because you are emotional and did not want to judge you.