https://twitter.com/tvietor08/status/1303091912392368128?s=21
Uh can I get a line item on the $800 million in “expenses” pls
6 Likes
Article says 350mil went to fundraising, ummmmm, shouldn’t that bring in more money than spent?
You don’t know much about fundraising in USA#1 in 2020 do you? Even outside of politics, the not for profit world exists as much for the purpose of hosting luxury soirees for rich people as it does for actually helping people in need of charity, maybe more. Tax sheltered parties are even more fun than after tax parties, dontcha know.
1 Like
I mean, JASON MILLER is a “senior adviser.” I doubt very many people here know one single person even approaching this guy’s scumbaggery.
2 Likes
There’s no formal way to do this or measure it, and the Democratic Party certainly won’t do it or approve of it in any way officially. So I don’t see this happening. Now, on the other hand, mobilizing massive demonstrations while SCOTUS is hearing such a case is very possible and what happens from there is pretty predictable.
The issue here is that I don’t think it can be measured or implemented preemptively.
That’s about the size of it, yeah. I’d narrow it down to a minimum of marching in the streets willing to bleed, or even die, for the cause - knowing that groups of protesters will be run over, will be shot at, will be beaten, likely will be attacked with pipe bombs and the like, will be arrested probably without due process, etc…
Fuck, I just realized something. This is when they may be counted, not when they shall or must be counted. I would imagine if DeSantis and the Secretary of State, who he appointed, want to delay that, they can. I mean, even if they can’t, LOL fuck you applies until a court rules - and maybe even after.
I’m sick of this shit from you. If Biden is like Obama, we’ll have about 80 percent fewer drone strikes per year than we do under Trump.
There have been 2,243 drone strikes in the first two years of the Trump presidency, compared with 1,878 in Mr Obama’s eight years in office, according to the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, a UK-based think tank.
Obama: 235 drone strikes per year
Trump: 1,122 drone strikes per year
Tell us more about how both sides are the same.
President Donald Trump has revoked a policy set by his predecessor requiring US intelligence officials to publish the number of civilians killed in drone strikes outside of war zones.
The 2016 executive order was brought in by then-President Barack Obama, who was under pressure to be more transparent.
Obama: Slight (not enough) transparency
Trump: Zero transparency
Source for all of the above:
7 Likes
Guys young people are definitely gonna show up this time
4 Likes
Wonder how that polled in '08, '12, '16, and '18 and whether it correlated strongly.
95% of people under 40 dont answer their phones to random numbers, or at all.
Edit: I’m probably dumb and it’s an online poll.
Biden’s had a small edge across several OH polls.
I’m not sure where you’re looking but 538 only logged 3 OH polls in the last month’s time, and chronologically they are even, Trump +4, and Trump +5.
RCP has Biden at a +2.3 average unless I’m misreading this, but I don’t think they have all the latest polls.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/oh/ohio_trump_vs_biden-6765.html
Rasmussen though. They go out of there way to “unskew” what they call the inherent dem
Polling bias.
Meh. Not you, but when Biden does 235 drone strikes a year 95% of the Democrats will just say “Trump did 1122” and we’ll just have to live forever like 235 drone strikes a year deserves the Nobel Peace Prize.
4 Likes
@anon38180840 sorry your damn brain is broken but both are fucking unacceptable.
Sorry that you see Obama’s drone strikes and think hey it’s cool to go back there. I’m advocating for people who incredibly, don’t want to do this stuff.
Ignore me so you can get that empty dome back under the sand
Remember in 2008 when ikes would come in to crow whenever Rasmussen had McCain up by 1-2%? And if you showed him that literally every other poll had Obama +6, he’s insist Ras is the only true reliable polling firm. Those were good times.
2 Likes
Yes. But you would agree that there is a 100% chance that we are getting one of those options, correct?