I wasn’t out of line. You have been making countless posts with no evidence an using well established conspiracy theory logic. It’s been textbook. I’ve been trying to point out your logical fallacies.
1 Like
I didn’t follow the Poker Bunny thing very closely at all because I thought it was petty and stupid from what I saw. It appeared there was plenty of blame to go around, but I don’t know enough specifics to have much of an opinion on it.
It’s within the range of plausible explanations. It’s not made up that such text messages are out there concerning other players.
This is a very weird post. Her net worth or non poker success have zero influence on this hand.
Knowing she literally didn’t put $1 toward her own buyin actually goes against her “success.”
From fellow players in Aussieland and USA it seems their poor behavior is based on legitimate mental health issues rather than Hellmuth just being a duck, but if you’re abusive enough to be banned from multiple venues this just isn’t a good enough excuse.
This is exactly how conspiracy logic works. Talk about unsubstantiated peripheral things because if give the air of evidence.
For two days you called me/compared me to a Qanoner, a conspiracy nut, a troll, and accused me of lying about my personal experiences. Then you claimed you haven’t been out of line at all! Even as others are telling you that you’ve been out of line!
You can refute or be skeptical of points without personal insults.
You’ve clearly been out of line and lucky commonwealth has been too kind to report posts.
1 Like
I can’t remember if it was here or on Twitter where someone said she had a staking deal where she gets 50% of the profit and doesn’t have to share in any of the losses, which I think is not unusual for a one-time deal with no make-up. This is not some proof that she’s not rich. If you think rich people don’t take freebies, I’ve got a PPP loan with your name on it.
Can we take this to the moderation thread? Oh sorry, I mean the Friday thread…
This is just how Clovis acts when he gets morally righteous about a topic.
1 Like
I also thought, so what?
2 Likes
Like when he wanted to run you off the forum because of your “edgy” posts? Oh wait, that was Commonwealth.
1 Like
This is how we are all suppose to act given we spend all our time pretending to be a super progressive left wing forum.
2 Likes
There may be some argument that, as a woman, she gets less of a leash than other, more established, male pros, but you can argue the problem is that they are treated with kid gloves rather than she is being singled out.
I have listened to a podcast with Poker Bunny where she does admit to having been put in a mental institution multiple times, but she seems to see it as a conspiracy between her mother and the mental health field to control and mistreat her. For example, she sees her not being allowed to have her phone after a suicide attempt as harm being done to her. I’m not sure if she sees herself as mentally ill. Even if she does, I suspect she now refuses all treatment and medication.
It’s kind of a “choose your battles” answer.
I have no problem with sex work, but making a sex work implication at a sex worker isn’t some huge over the line insult imo.
I’d also add that man or woman, someone with a huge history of being very abusive towards players and dealers just doesn’t get sympathy towards me. We can choose better people to defend.
If this were a super-progressive left-wing forum, we’d all be hardcore anti-capitalists. It’s a left-of-Republicans forum, certainly, but that can span a wide range from Manchin to pure tankie.
1 Like
Dude I honestly like you but you have a massive blind spot here. The only reason to mention her OF is to leverage the widespread stigma of sex work. You are just using it as shorthand for “she is lesser so worthy of scorn”.
2 Likes
I understand why Commonwealth was uncomfortable with my posts. I dislike when people think such posts are edgelording, which I interpret as intending to shock and provoke a reaction, and not my sincere beliefs that I wish to discuss further.
I also dislike when Clovis claims I make up hands because he doesn’t play in games that play that way. When he does that, he’s doing the same thing Robbi’s detractors are doing. He says I lie because the hands I describe are outside his experience so they can’t possibly be real. People who say Robbi cheated do so because they say the hand makes no sense so she must have cheated.
1 Like
Can you name a hand that has had this much conversation where it wasn’t clear cheating? Like the first thing that comes to mind is potripper 10 high.
I genuinely can’t think of a non cooler to ever get this much discussion. This was on the front page of reddit!
Dwans Q10 was maybe the closest of the last decade but that was like 1% of this because they just got folds.