There is no discussion.
You just repeat the same dumb arguments over and over again.
1 Like
Which ones?
Here’s the original post on 2+2 about the thing Bruce linked above:
1 Like
J4non
4 Likes
So if I go back and see that nobody has talked about my comparison of Postle to Garrett, you’re going to humbly apologize right?
Can somebody who’s thirsty to watch Hu4Rolllzz help this dude out?
The post reads like parody, I hope it is.
Ya it might be dumbest thing I have ever read and that is saying something.
It comes from the Twitter account that looks like it belongs to an anti-vaxx crypto-bro who really hates John Fetterman, so seems like someone who would believe it.
1 Like
Also, tangentially, for future posts I’d recommend writing but editing out things such as “like a small annoying dog that pisses itself all the time” as opposed to adding them in afterwards by edit. The onomatopoeia of “yap yap… yap” properly conveys a small dog barking and there’s no need for the descriptive simile. Approach it like Hemingway, just cross out the clunky and unwiedly parts to leave the prose blunt and tight. I get that some people think Hemingway was a hack, just going on and on about seeing the bulls then drinking the wine then seeing the bulls then drinking the wine but generally a lack of verbosity serves one well, with the rare exception being a post like the one I just typed.
5 Likes
I’m pretty confident 6ix plays for a living and would happily hu4rollz jmakin. LFG boys
This is an odd read given only one side is willing to play and it’s not him.
1 Like
Settling Internet arguments via HU4Rollz sounds about as effective a means of argument settling as trial by combat. That said, I think @jmakin would absolutely wreck Six HU, and it would be fun to watch, so I hope it happens.
1 Like
6ix dominated OCM poker which was a tough lineup.
2 Likes
Bare minimum clock management skills on display here which isnt guaranteed with Mike.
1 Like
It might depend on the choice of games.
But, also, I offer to settle my next dispute on this forum via trial by combat.
1 Like
It’s not exactly a read. He’s a huge 2-card nit though
1 Like
ahem
please see my previous “ahem”
they’re such fishdonks people who possess questionable poker ability they don’t even consider that part lol it’s wild
edit: i need a ruling on whether ‘fishdonk’ falls under the ‘no name calling’ guidelines