That’s not what I’m saying. I’m saying she’s not a whale or a maniac. She’s more like a regfish. I’d expect a player like her to overfold some spots, lose more than she should with strong second best hands sometimes, and every now and then get too loose preflop or on the flop for a few BB here and there.
What I’ve been arguing is she’s not an incompetent whale. Like she’s probably profitable in soft LA 5/10 or 10/20 games.
Do you agree you have far too little data to make this an objective claim? If it’s just a feeling fine but it’s not evidence.
You keep adding caveats. Half NL half 6 card Omaha. No cams necessary. The people demand it!
I’m not much of a poker player. Is 55/45 a spot where you’re looking to shove it all or put in $100k? I think I"d look for a better spot, but like I said I’m not much of a poker player so don’t know if the right decision is to throw it all in on a coinflip?
With the money in there already they’re making nearly $20k with that play.
I dont think its as black and white as that, but that’s the maths.
That’s definitely one of the weaknesses of the cheating theory. You’d have to assume that over the course of an evening’s play that there’d be numerous much better spots than calling an all-in on the turn with, say, 55% equity (leaving aside pot odds for the moment).
One variant of the cheating theory proposes that Robbi/her signaller knew that her hand would hold up after the river (even with running it twice).
Now we’re into knowing the cards to come.
If you were smart enough to figure that part out, certainly you’d be smart enough to wait for better spots.
I think, and many people do that they were trying to get Garrett.
Not positive or anything, but short of dealing a crooked deck it’s tough to "wait for a better spot " to get the best cash game player on earth.
I’ll have to take your word on it as I have about 1/100th the poker knowledge of many on this board.
My experience with poker the last handful of years has been playing in a couple of weekly tournaments where the players can’t figure out that passing the deck each hand is sufficient to indicate who the dealer is, so we pass the deck, the small blind button, and the big blind button every hand.
I don’t think anyone believes it was a sophisticated operation anymore. Aggrieved parties getting over their skiis and realizing it midway down the mountain.
New conspiracy theory. The dealer is in on it. Robbie played a lot of Jx weirdly because the dealer hid J 
up her sleeve with plans to sneak it back in when needed.
https://twitter.com/LiveWaffle/status/1581665330962628609?s=20&t=lEWRyHcczUNUSn0pvOV6uA
https://twitter.com/LiveWaffle/status/1581666149988962304?s=20&t=lEWRyHcczUNUSn0pvOV6uA
https://twitter.com/LiveWaffle/status/1581668094728368132?s=20&t=lEWRyHcczUNUSn0pvOV6uA
https://twitter.com/LiveWaffle/status/1581677751614214144?s=20&t=lEWRyHcczUNUSn0pvOV6uA
No, for those curious, JMakin is not my sock puppet account.
He knows this, he just looking for a way to back out, similar to how the h4r was originally a way to back out of sharing a text or oral hand history of a Way Crazier Call in a Way Dumber Spot.
You guys can play a ten-game mix, five games picked by each, 40bb cap on big bet games.
I’m the one who wanted big bet and not fixed limit; JMakin is good at stirring up confusion.
Everyone with more than 3 posts in the last week should be banned for spamming.
There was no new information and nothing to discuss.
Ok look, we can do webcams but we have to wear plague doctor masks. I don’t want people to see my face and I certainly don’t want to look at JMakin’s face.
I know who’s who. I am just pointing out a fair way to include fixed limit and big bet in a mixed game challenge.
It’s a discussion board not a news feed. You might’ve clicked on the wrong website in which case I recommend adopting some GTO Solver Approved lines when approaching your browser tabs.
I’ve offered you 7 different games and you come back with uno. yap yap yap yap yap. like a small annoying dog that pisses itself all the time. all you do. yea i’m the one backing out - you’re sad and small, and quite pathetic.