I hope she just happened to have some Altoids there.
1 Like
Seems like they would have checked her for electronics during this sidebar they had?
HCL is owned by a former cop who owes his limited poker skills and the success of his business to Garrett, who is also a good friend (according to Garrett). I’m sure we will get the most honest and forthright investigation… Also, LOL polygraph testing. Anybody that submits to polygraph testing at the request of a former cop and current scumbag who is good buddies with the other side of the argument is an idiot. But not submitting to a fraudulent technique will be taken as further “evidence” of cheating by the incels. I hope you guys are right about HCL turning on Garrett when they find no wrongdoing, but I don’t see it. I see a Roger Goodell special in the works.
1 Like
The conspiracy nut anthem
1 Like
Here’s a third possibility: being an alien herself she has access to advanced alien technology that enables information to be relayed by vibrating heavy objects.
3 Likes
I just read on Reddit if you take Robbi’s name, reverse it, add the word poker, convert it to Hebrew, and then to its decimal equivalent it spells out “I cheated!!”
Case closed!
1 Like
Objection!
1 Like
I’m on she misread her hand then got flustered when garret went psycho mode and spewed a load of garbage to try and cover her mistake. But I’m not certain enough to go as hard as you guys are at someone like cuse who believes the opposite. It’s a weird enough situation that it could be the dumbest cheating in the world. I just don’t think that’s the Occam approved line.
Is it Adel-STEEN or Adel-STINE?
I’m still only 95/5 she didn’t cheat but the more Cuse makes his case the further it moves me to lol close to zero chance she cheated.
He is engaging in quintessential conspiracy behaviour. Just completely ignoring facts, always favouring the extraordinary over the mundane, and acting like each new piece of “evidence” holds equal weight, no matter how weak.
The entire thing is so easily explained if we assume she thought she has a 3, which she stated a dozen times immediately following the hand, before all this nonsense was even public due to the broadcast lag. She has stated it since many times. And, most importantly it makes perfect sense in the context of the hand.
Everything Cuse is posting is simply weather balloons must be space aliens junk.
He also won’t bet which is another hallmark of conspiracy nuts.
1 Like
It just doesn’t make sense that if she was intending to cheat and all set up to cheat, that she’d choose THAT spot to do it.
Exactly. And she did so as the very first hand to cheat on.
If she did cheat, I am convinced it’s something like 1,000:1 it was electronic in any way. I am very confident on my bet against jwax at this point. 
Isn’t the bet with jwax about if the cheating signal was ahead/behind versus something else? It doesn’t have anything to do with being electronic, does it?
If not electronic, how else would she only know ahead or behind? If she saw cards she knows more right?
I mean I guess someone could signal her at the table or from outside ahead/behind with gestures. 🤷 sort of like the Who Wants to be a Millionaire scam. Seems like any gesture scam would contain more info no?
Yeah could be the dude in the Cowboy has picking his nose or something.
Sure but if you are designing a gesture scam surely it contains more info than ahead behind?
The ahead behind thing was based on her using some vibrating vagina balls or some shit.
If she’s really a newb why? I would think it would be more like call/fold/raise or something very similar. Which in my mind would be awarded to the ahead/behind side of the bet.
What? No way jwax wins if it’s call fold bet. Maybe we need to nail this down more.
In my mind if the signal system contains any possible information above ahead behind I win?
Well yeah these questions are exactly why I decided I wanted nothing to do with the bet, even though I believe jwax is very reasonable.
Yup. And that scam was so obvious the programme makers started investigating straight away.
I’d guess that if TV pictures are being shown from a number of angles it’s going to be a very high risk cheat.