Looks like that is correct
1 Like
yes, so did rip. who got it in bad numerous times.
had reza won his hands wouldn’t make any sense to anyone.
the hand in question btw where she called drawing dead on the turn is somehow a ‘data point’ that she’s cheating.
also i’m no vibration expert, but if she knew she was behind on the flop and turn (cause cheating) but called to improve (supposedly), why would she need to wait for another vibration to confirm she’s behind when she didn’t improve?
if i understand the timebank theory correctly, this hand completely disproves it.
1 Like
A lot of people think she’s working with Rip to cheat. If you were Rip, would you let her have the device or would you be the one wearing it?
It’s not necessarily about winning or losing the hand after the runout. It’s about how the money went in. Obviously there are different methods of cheating so either is theoretically possible. If Reza kept calling off absurd hands like this and being right, it would be extremely suspicious.
no he called absurd hands and was wrong. like this chick would have been if she played for a while longer.
I believe it either gets a bit wider or the photo is cropped there. I was watching on my TV and had a decent enough look.
Sure, but she’s not doing it the whole time she’s thinking. It happens for a short period of time, maybe 5 seconds. And in this case she’s thinking on the river with J high facing an overbet after using a timebank. It’s another super weird situation all around.
I’m not saying it’s 100% but there are several very suspicious moments/data points and she changed her story several times. It all adds up to a lot of suspicion.
Remember when you thought bird poop on your garage was a possible hate crime against your girlfriend?
No offense intended but you seem to be on the conspiritard of things
12 Likes
I think it’s important to split the discussion out. There’s the did she cheat or not debate, and I don’t see how anyone can be 100% either way. Then there’s the if she cheated, how?
I’m on the side that she likely cheated, and I can present a few possible ways but have no strong feelings about exactly which one.
Maybe she can get buzzed but it takes a certain amount of time, so she doesn’t really know until the river. Maybe she knows on each street but wanted to make sure she didn’t cross signals before decisions in large pots. I don’t know. Maybe there’s a signal for ahead/behind and another for you can fold them out with a raise vs no they’re nutted. I have no clue.
My take is that cheating is likely and there are several possible scenarios of how she could have done so.
It is ironic that Garrett calling her out likely makes it impossible to ever prove or disprove.
you can’t just ignore the moment where your “suspicious data points” contradict each other.
Here is the theory, as far as i understands it. Robbi gets signaled in a binary way, ahead or behind.
Flop KQQ, she calls with J8 and a backdoor flush draw against Garrett’s Q4. She knows she’s behind.
Turn 4d, giving her a flush draw but she’s drawing dead. She calls again, knowing she’s behind. In most cases this would guarantee she’s not cheating (because she’s DRAWING DEAD), but we are doing the binary method so maybe she thought she could improve and win.
She BRICKS the river. She is now behind for sure. Her hand did not improve and because she’s cheating she knows she’s still behind.
She then tanks for a minute, put out a time bank, wait for her WHOLE CHAIR TO VIBRATE and then folds what she already knows is the losing hand.
This is what mormons believe.
4 Likes
I tend to give credence to longtail possibilities. Maybe too much. But Doug Polk and Tom Dwan have similar opinions to mine.
Also, you really can’t say “No offense, but” and add “tard” in. That’s offensive. You can say “No offense but you tend to be conspiratorial,” but there’s no need to be throwing around slurs/partial slurs against the mentally challenged like that.
The context around that is quite different from the way this forum uses “libtard” in that we are repurposing it and also nobody here thinks anyone else here is one.
1 Like
i think it’s very unlikely she was cheating, but the hand in question (J4) is so fucked up that an investigation is necessary.
The doug polk vibrating chair bullshit is beyond moronic and clearly done only to get views to his shitty sleeveless videos.
5 Likes
Fine, I think you’re more prone to believe conspiracy theories than most people on this forum.
Ok, one possibility is that you can’t relay info for X seconds for some technological reason. So she doesn’t know on early streets where she stands and is playing somewhat straight up, but peeling wide to exploit the cheating. She calls the flush draw not knowing, then wants a signal.
Here’s another possibility:
Let’s say we have a system. You know the hands, I’m playing. You help me on each street. One buzz = ahead, two = behind. But I also want to know if I can bluff them if I’m behind, so we work out a secondary method. After the first signal, I do something to indicate I want to bluff and you give me one buzz to do it and two not to. Maybe I gross my arms or ask the opponent a question or use a time chip.
I believe cheating was likely, as to the system I have no idea. But there are plausible methods that would match her behavior.
so how did she know she was ahead with J4 where she called the flop with J high and minraised the turn?
and also she attempted a bluff that could never work given Garrett’s actual hand there.
1 Like
semi related i’ve been cheated twice in live poker games (that i know of) and it was blatantly clear when looking back (it was semi clear during the games but i was so tilted i somehow didn’t see the obvious signs).
Agreed.
Maybe, but Berkey went there too. I think it warrants looking into. Hopefully they have other camera angles, even in surveillance, and can issue a statement on it definitively.
They can also use other camera angles and surveillance to watch her entire session, and prior ones, to see if she bounces in her chair regularly. If those views show that the only time it happens is in hands while thinking and it’s always the exact same duration or binary (say 1 second or 5 seconds), then they’ll know
If she’s cheating, she’s a moron to call off J4, so why can’t she be using a moronic and obvious cheating method? I’ve caught two cheaters using moronic methods IRL, and seen two get caught using moronic methods.
-
Postle couldn’t bring himself to stack off the second nuts and made it obvious.
-
Lusardi clogged the toilets in a second casino by flushing the evidence when he was < 100 yards away from a bay.
-
I caught a guy rigging the deck in his lap in a pass the deck home game and coolering people with quads over quads repeatedly in the same night.
-
Two people sitting in the 4 and 5 seat whispering to each other.
not tony too 
what’s next, his 720 was actually a 360 recorded twice?
3 Likes