New Moderator Confirmation Votes: jman220, MrWookie, commonWealth, and Crunchyblack

[Jalfrezi]

That is a fair point.

[j8i3h289dn3x7]

@Jalfrezi

cuse, however, demanded a name change, equivalent to anonymisation.

No, he requested a name change because of doxxing fears. That is completely different than asking that the account be anonymized and banned, and I know you know this.

[j8i3h289dn3x7]

@Jalfrezi

While you did demand a perma to leave the site uhm permanently, as my post stated.

I requested a 2 week ban followed by a perma, per our cooldown rules, and then I never followed through and asked for the perma after the cooldown period ended. Your arguments are weak as shit.

[Jalfrezi]

Well I’m just going by what I see above, in which you asked for “two weeks followed by a perma as well”, not “two weeks to give me a chance to stop raging”.

[anon38180840]

@MrJbroRisen

He’s so afraid of doxxing that he put cuse back in his account profile and gleefully shares IRL info related to poker when he goes on a donkament heater.

I’ve repeatedly said cuse is fine and the full version is not, which was just used recently so since I’m not a mod yet I’m going to flag that and ask them to edit it to say cuse.

[anon38180840]

My specific concerns were addressed in detail when it came up, the issue has been resolved, and I am going to decline your attempt to start arguing about it.

[otatop]

@j8i3h289dn3x7

@cassette

There is zero need to add mods 5, 6, and 7 to police the 40 people on this site

Well, to be fair, we swell to 120 people when Wookie is on the ballot.

This is actually incredibly consistent, wookie also had 120 voters last time he was up and received 79 Yes votes.

[anon38180840]

Sorry for interrupting when my name came up, carry on. Also please refrain from name calling and personal insults such as “dumb dumb.”

[j8i3h289dn3x7]

@MrJbroRisen

Maybe don’t step in then dumb dumb

This appears to me to be a personal attack.

[Jalfrezi]

Is it ok to refer to you by your nom de plume “fuckyoubanme”, respecting your doxxing fears?

[anon38180840]

Well I’m not a mod yet so I have no role in setting moderation policy yet, as a result that’s not really up to me.

[hokie]

@goofyballer

Thinking of this post after Tilted and otatop’s turns at volunteering resulted in virulent hatred directed at them by your friends & CW’s volunteering already starting the same way before he’s even modded

Huh? My post was a response to simp’s post here:

@simplicitus

Didn’t read this thread, but bad mod selection rules, like we currently have, are a genuine risk to this forum.

@hokie

I thought the rotating mods idea for maximum participation was kinda cool but I guess that’s

I don’t understand what you’re trying to say. I still think the rotating mods idea was a good one to reduce the vitriol directed at any particular mod and spread around the effort associated with being a mod.

In this specific instance, I voted against several candidates because I do not think it is in the best interest of the forum to make them essentially permanent mods. I don’t think I’d vote for them even if they were rotating mods tbh, but that doesn’t mean I don’t think the rotating mods was a good idea.

[StrontiumDog]

@anon38180840

Well I’m not a mod yet so I have no role in setting moderation policy yet

Do mods set the moderation policy now?

[anon38180840]

@StrontiumDog

Do mods set the moderation policy now?

Yes.

[NotBruceZ]

He obviously thinks that not having his real name or the full cr name so that you won’t get hits from searching for those is sufficient protection.

[StrontiumDog]

Sounds like an excellent system.

[NotBruceZ]

We should have clear rules established on voter eligibility before the next mod election?

• Yes
• No

[Jalfrezi]

Who is eligible to vote in this?

[NotBruceZ]

He didn’t see it for obvious reasons.

[Jalfrezi]

You think he hasn’t poured over that thread since? ok