Your mileage may vary, but I went in with the modest expectation that I would like it pretty well and that the IMAX would be pretty unnecessary, and came away absolutely loving it and being glad I saw it in IMAX.
1 Like
Love Chamalet.
1 Like
I think a big draw of the movies Nolan makes is the score and sound editing.
Dunkirk in theaters added a ton.
2 Likes
Dialogue that you canāt hear half the time is a big draw for people? As someone with hearing issues i basically refuse to go see a Nolan movie in the theater, need those subtitles.
I enjoyed Oppenheimer in the theater, but I probably donāt make it through it at home. Iām too easily distracted and it is definitely not action-packed.
1 Like
I think the appeal of Timothy Chalamet is that heās hot as fuck.
1 Like
2 Likes
Oh good, Iām not the only one. I always feel crazy when I look at him and think āmehhhhhhh, probably not.ā
1 Like
I tried watching Interstellar again and boy was that a tough watch. I turned it off when a wild Matt Damon appears and I understood not even he was going to save a repeat viewing.
2 Likes
Idk either I think he was wildly miscast in Dune. Should have given the lead to Bautista.
1 Like
Heās no @clovis8 , but heās sexy enough.
2 Likes
Adding this to my mental bank of comments ITT that have left me afraid to give Interstellar a second watch after loving it the first time.
1 Like
The dialogue is so bad that I suddenly reconsidered why the music mix makes it so hard to hear what anyone is saying.
Itās got SO MUCH that works for it. The cast and performances are great and it LOOKS amazing. But never before have I felt Nolanās flaws as a storyteller be more plainly apparent than when rewatching Interstellar.
Eh I loved it every time Iāve watched it
It was good, but if the implication is that it was better than In Bruges then my snap-reaction on first watch is that I donāt think I agree. Very different movies obviously, so not an easy comparison regardless of the obvious overlap.
She was wonderful and Iām pretty sure I want to marry her now. Farrell was great too.
2 Likes
No no, not better than In Bruges. Obviously different, but I would be surprised to find an In Bruges fan who didnt enjoy Banshees
Okay yeah, definitely agree with that. And I do immediately feel committed to giving this a second watch before too terribly long, so I donāt even completely rule out the possibility of flipping my preference between the two in the future.
So I donāt like to use the word āmasterpieceā lightly, but Iāve just seen two masterpieces: Friedkinās Sorcerer (1977) and Godfrey Hoās Ninja: The Violent Sorcerer (1982). 10/10 genre-defying masterpieces, nothing more to say, really.
2 Likes
I got some delightful discussion of that very film for ya
1 Like