I’m not sure if jmakin’s data includes likes from PMs, but the software does not include likes from PMs for the purposes of calculating Trust Levels.
Trust Level 3 — Regular
To get to trust level 3, in the last 100 days…
Must have visited at least 50% of days
Must have replied to at least 10 different non-PM topics
Of topics created in the last 100 days, must have viewed 25% (capped at 500)
Of posts created in the last 100 days, must have read 25% (capped at 20k)
Must have received 20 likes, and given 30 likes.*
Must not have received more than 5 spam or offensive flags (with unique posts and unique users for each, confirmed by a moderator)
Must not have been suspended or silenced
* These likes must be across a minimum number of different users (1/5 the number), across a minimum number of different days (1/4 the number). Likes cannot be from PMs.
Pm’s are weird. Am I weird for thinking that? I don’t ever send pm’s unless it’s to settle a bet or something important I think needs attention.
I tried finding pm data with the api. I couldn’t due to permission levels I think (but i didnt try very hard). So I don’t think that data is lumped in with this data.
That’s a good point. Sometimes I have funny one liners in the middle of a long multi-quote and I probably lose likes from getting scrolled past. It improves my mental health to do it in bulk, though, so not worth the pursuit of likes.
The point is he continuously has horrible takes and makes terrible predictions, then has the gall to tell some of us we’re gross for wanting Dems to insist on aid through January or nothing, because McConnell could decide to help later because it’s the right thing to do.
Simply put, he’s always wrong, never admits it, and acts like people who have been predicting things accurately are totally clueless. So I’m not letting it slide until he admits it and/or knocks it off.
That’s part of what I was talking about, though. I know some people like it and some hate it and it costs me popularity and likes, but it’s important imo to call out wishcasty bullshit and discourage it, so I keep doing it.
I say this as someone who generally likes your posts and thinks that you are right about this particular exchange: We get it, and nunn doesn’t care what you have to say. Just let it go.
What do you suggest? He ignores reason and logic, refuses to engage with people who are persistently critical, and continues posting nonsensical takes consistently. What response is there other than dunking on him and/or bringing up his past bad takes when they are proven wrong?
I’m on team LikeClovis 90% of the time! 10% of the time he forgets his meds, and that’s fine, many people struggle with mental illness. I have an Uncle who does yoga.
Nun calls people dumb and includes criticism of the poster he is replying to in 80% of his posts. He constantly talks down to most. He is not a victim and the fact he is at the very bottom of the likes/post count down with republicans, trump and HNH is not a coincidence.
That being said learning to ignore him rather than engage is massively +ev.
