I’ll never get why people choose to troll such a small, irrelevant forum where maybe 10 people will even read your trolling. Either way we’re done now.
-You shouldn’t @ somebody to make a personal attack
-What purity test?
-Who are my candidates?
-Who is the last woke liberal he’s had on? Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure he’d enjoying sparring with a woke liberal, but it’s the ritual airing of grievances against identity politics that brings in the clicks.
-Somebody brought up Rogan in two posts that seemed to address things I had said about him in the past, since I had argued with this person (and a few others) about it before. I responded to those posts.
-Ok, Awa’ an bile yer heid then
Race/gender are an issue for who? Sanders has the most POC support of any candidate. His competitors are Bloomberg and Trump!
Obama left the wilderness the second he was out of office. He’s not a saviour, he’s not in the tent building business anymore. He cashed out.
I think you get it just fine.
Bill Maher has “woke liberals” on all the time and he’s more of a piece of shit than Rogan is. I even used to watch Maher all the time and never liked Rogan.
Brother I hate to tell you but he’s not the one trolling here.
Buttigieg and super PAC improperly coordinated on Nevada ads, watchdog group says
A campaign finance watchdog group has filed a complaint alleging that the presidential campaign of Pete Buttigieg improperly coordinated with VoteVets, a super PAC supporting the campaign of the former mayor of South Bend, Ind.
In the complaint, filed Tuesday with the Federal Election Commission, the Campaign Legal Center alleged that Buttigieg’s campaign improperly accepted more than $639,000 in contributions, in violation of federal rules barring candidates from coordinating with independent groups that can raise and spend unlimited amounts of money.
The complaint centers on a tweet by Buttigieg senior strategist Michael Halle analyzing the strengths of a particular campaign message in Nevada, and a subsequent ad campaign in that state by VoteVets that appeared to follow the strategy outlined in the tweet.
Bernie’s the one with all the dark money though.
People were saying her campaign lobbied for Bloomberg to be included weren’t they?
FWIW, the general concensus in the land of the Jews is Bernie=Corbyn=Baby Hitler.
Decent response
America is facing atm an existential threat atm, its not a cool place to be atm and I was very intrigued in how that threat would be met that was my coming to these threads… So ill take the time here to thank peeps like yourself for understanding and giving me space to learn.
Yeah his latest guests have been poor imo when he should have far more KyleKulinski’s on.
My points about Joe are simple…
-
It’s not about Joe, think voters.
-
If Joe managed to turn only a handful then it’s worth giving his Bernie shows a few clicks imo.
-
Sometimes you need to engage the enemy to get the stragglers to vote your way. Especially in these dark times. And not to agree with them.
It’s not about giving Joe a endorsement, if you watch Bernie imo it’s giving the wink, until everyone is on side that’s enough to win this election and then see who’s for real.
Let’s try everything to win this except criminal Ofcourse, even if it means smiling and nodding while holding your tongue for 5 minutes because the fascists are in town and they ain’t slowing down, Billy B is a fucking manic and shits just got real, there’s no laws atm to stop them and no-one is even willing to make a scene in the Senate, (Paranoid Am I) no I don’t think so.
There’s more serious stuff to contend with and it’s only going to get worse, let’s see who’s on our side after the storm is over and accept folks who wouldn’t normally come for the ride.
I agree with Trolly that there’s no need to pander to them though… Let the podcasters do that lol. /s
Peace brother…
Yeah,I was trying to give the big threads here another shot, but that was a mistake on my part. Good luck trying to actually grow the user base here lol.
Honest response, if there’s a specific discussion you’re looking to have just start a thread. I think most would be happy to carve discussions out of the megathreads, it’s just that once the discussion gets underway no one bothers opening a separate thread.
If anyone is watching and wants to throw some highlights in this thread it’d be much appreciated
First few questions were predictable “won’t you take away my union insurance” mild scaremongering about healthcare. Bernie mostly sticking to the talking points so far.
Currently answering a question about immigration and seems to be doing well.
I don’t generally watch much TV (yeah, I’m great), but hanging out with my mom today (broke her ankle - she’ll be ok, but it sucks because she can’t get up and down), but anyway, she has the TV on all the time and it’s non-stop Steyer and Bloomberg commercials.
The first question was actually really interesting, which Bernie kinda dodged. If Bernie were the nominee, would he accept all the $ Bloomberg has pledged to use to help the nominee. Bernie essentially said he didn’t need his help/money, but didn’t directly say he wouldn’t accept the help.
Apparently Bernie has a national rent control platform, which I didn’t know about. So that’s cool.
Good, because not taking Bloomberg’s money is fucking stupid. It’ll work as well as “when they go low we go high” did.