Joe Cada mad (assuming this is his acct anyway)
These people drop $$ all the time at these casinos and keeping their customers alive is going to ruin the brand.
Natural immunity is as effective or more effective than vaccines
seen this from multiple pros
where the **** did this garbage come from (k, this is rhetorical I donât care) god these people man
safe and effective of course (not behind paywall this time)
Kinda amazing you can be good at logical deduction and still a trumper and right int psycho
They tend to be a lot better with exploiting others in logical people deduction, which is an element of poker. Itâs a different skill than logical deduction.
Foxen is the two-time GPI POTY and Bicknell is the three-time GPI Female POTY. I think Foxen gets mentioned when people talk about the best tournament players, at least for NL. Amusingly, he has zero WSOP bracelets, while Bicknell has three.
Cousins arenât a big loss. I barely talk to any of mine and Iâm content.
Was a weird teacherâs meeting today. Every teacher packed into a single room. No distancing with 2 teachers (myself included) wearing masks. And honestly, I didnât think to wear it until I was already in the room.
There was one teacher in the back coughing a bit. Makes me wonder if he/she has covid. Itâd be such a lol moment for school to get shut down before it even starts.
1 Like
If you mean the immunity occurring naturally from a prior infection, there was an article in Science yesterday talking about this:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/08/having-sars-cov-2-once-confers-much-greater-immunity-vaccine-no-infection-parties
Itâs based on a preprint that uses Israeli data.
Itâs hard for me to get mad at people relying on Science as a source. Whether Science should be publishing stories based on this preprint is another question.
Now, if you mean the more general statement âA healthy body provides better defense against COVID than a vaccineâ, then Iâve got nothing for you.
I thought this already happened?
https://twitter.com/btcinvestorhodl/status/1428183057274597380
donât know this guy but man thereâs some tweets in there crypto name check, trump really won, alex jones is a genius predictor, etc
https://twitter.com/RandallZandstra/status/1431303129757224962
he mad
https://twitter.com/LukeBlindert/status/1431293836958093313
he also mad
https://twitter.com/shadybill2222/status/1431298788157689863
only posted this one cause of the avatar
https://twitter.com/Tylivingthedre1/status/1431314821975322635
1 Like
so a study that shows vaccinated + having alpha is better than not being vaccinated and having covid previously and they print this as the headline and itâs called a science magazine???
god these people are fâing morons
It seems like they are making a distinction between first reported deer with âinfectionsâ versus âantibodiesâ, as this very article mentions the cases reported by USDA in 3 or 4 other states that was written up in Smithsonian Magazine (IIRC).
1 Like
K-hole is pretty fun. I like that itâs super short and doesnât go on and on long after you just want to get off the ride.
Iâm not reading the preprint, but the first paragraph of the Science story sounds different from what youâre saying:
The natural immune protection that develops after a SARS-CoV-2 infection offers considerably more of a shield against the Delta variant of the pandemic coronavirus than two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, according to a large Israeli study that some scientists wish came with a âDonât try this at homeâ label. The newly released data show people who once had a SARS-CoV-2 infection were much less likely than vaccinated people to get Delta, develop symptoms from it, or become hospitalized with serious COVID-19.
My interpretation is that theyâre comparing two groups:
- vaccinated people who had not been previously infected
- previously-infected people who were not vaccinated.
Edit: I ended up looking in the pre-print, and that seems to be an accurate summary. In Model 1 of the pre-print, they definitely claim to be comparing those two groups:
In model 1, we examined natural immunity and vaccine-induced immunity by comparing the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2-related outcomes between previously infected individuals who have never been vaccinated and fully vaccinated SARS-CoV-2-naĂŻve individuals.
And the results do indeed imply that prior infection provides a better defense than the vaccines:
After adjusting for comorbidities, we found a statistically significant 13.06-fold (95% CI, 8.08 to 21.11) increased risk for breakthrough infection as opposed to reinfection ( P <0.001).
So I think the Science summary seems to accurately capture what the preprint is claiming. (Again, no idea if the preprint is correct.)
So those people are tripping balls the whole time theyâre intubated?
Your wife got slipped a mickey. No one enjoys tripping unless they willingly go into it, and then not all the time.
Seems like a shitton of poker pros are getting their bubbles popped today that theyâre on the wrong side of history and not everyone is thirdway quack science Rogan bro.
I said prior PLUS the vaccine > prior according to that study
Itâs a disaster to print what they did as the headline and that sentence that prior > vaccine unless they want people to not get the vaccine.
I spouted off twice in that thread, then unsubscribed. LMK if anything interesting happens other than 800 anti-vaxx dipshits losing their minds.
1 Like