I guess I must have survived by not participating.
Itâs more like one guy finally got banned after doxxing multiple people and the neverending shitstorm immediately stopped.
Yea man the quality of this forum sure is great compared to 3 years ago
3 years ago we all had multiple common enemies (like Trump and COVID) and as those common enemies fell away the knives came out for one another over relatively minor differences.
At least thatâs how it seemed to me, maybe the infighting was always there and never changed but just became more apparent as we moved on from monitoring every new COVID variant and insane Trump tweet.
UP fantasy fiction probably deserves its own thread
4 posts were merged into an existing topic: Bickering about old drama
Right, it was jal AND six getting banned that stopped the shit show.
the work of the anti-ahole posse is never-ending
et al.
Hard unnecessary use of the n word? No problems here.
Vague reference to someoneâs religion? Permaban.
Reinstate jal and 6ix.
Jal and 6ix were forum cancer, and the forum is a better place now that they are gone. However, I personally think some of the other bans were a bit heavy-handed. My antenna goes up when people say they feel âunsafeâ. Such claims, while often valid, are not above scrutiny, and I donât think people should be permabanned for calling out someoneâs religion in appropriate contexts. I am an atheist and itâs important to understanding my perspective on many issues. I think itâs important to apply common sense to such decisions. Strictly following bright-line rules turns people into Scalia. That said, I appreciate the efforts of the mods doing a difficult job.
There has been exactly one other ban and it was enacted for the exact same reason as 6ix and jalâs.
Hereâs the context:
cassette decided, out of nowhere and for no reason, to use a bible quote in response to a wookie post.
Then jal and 6ix decided to hop in on the fun.

The good Christian who didnât swear like a trooper is dead.

I donât know of any other sweary religious zealots here.

Oh donât get me wrong, I swear like a trooper too but Iâm not avowedly religious so thatâs ok.
If anything one might argue I was too heavy handed banning jal.
I did not know the specific context there, though understood a certain charitable way throwing out a bible quote could be construed as a clever piece of rhetoric. I assumed it was something like, âOf course you support Israel, youâre nothing but an arab-hating jewâ or similar.
In terms of being heavy-handed with Jaz, his body of work speaks for itself, and he should have been banned years ago. I think you and the mods do a solid job. I am just generally of the opinion that the baseline for bans should be fairly high, especially now that the worst offenders are gone.

cassette decided, out of nowhere and for no reason, to use a bible quote in response to a wookie post.
Wow, sounds serious. Straight to permaban jail with him.
He was warned and chose to ignore the warning.

@cassette gets a week off for violating the new moderation policy.
I deleted the thread hinting at cuseâs initials.Next time is permanent.
Iâm confused what recent ban are you talking about? Has somebody been banned over Israel Hamas matters? Or OlD dRaMa?
Old drama. I tend to only read moderation threads every few months. I only ventured into this section because of some recent technical issues with the site.

Old drama
Used to be a banable offence IIRC - in the Jalfezzi Era

Jal and 6ix were forum cancer,
aha, he loves the (old) drama

If anything one might argue I was too heavy handed banning jal.
hear, hear - never too late to correct a bad decision
Lol churchill youâre one of the top 5 worst posters OAT you donât have a leg to stand on.
but yes unban jalfrezi. I made a similar post before but it was deleted by mods. Weird how yours arenât.