That’s because you have no objective right to find anybody irritating and hate them.
p.s. Lol that’s like Abuse 101. The perpetrator doesn’t get to frame things the same way the victim does holy shit. And Trolly is just flummoxed.
That’s because you have no objective right to find anybody irritating and hate them.
p.s. Lol that’s like Abuse 101. The perpetrator doesn’t get to frame things the same way the victim does holy shit. And Trolly is just flummoxed.
not trying to be rude here, but if you can’t see why people have a problem with him and his choices over the past year with respect to this forum, that’s a you problem.
to suggest that he’s been nothing more than irritating is the whiteiest of forum whitewashing ever. being wilfully ignorant to the (forum) damage he’s directly responsible for doesn’t mean he hasn’t caused any, nor should anyone else be asked to act like it didn’t happen.
This is all dumb. If this is trolling for funsies, there are ways to troll someone and have a little fun without inducing bans. If forum wars are serious business, then this is a pathetic and weak way of lashing out at someone.
Some people are either trying too hard or not trying hard enough.
Times like this I wonder if people are even aware that reddit and twitter and facebook exists.
I’m tickled by the idea that we are living in the future, close to having our consciousnesses uploaded, and these dudes would partially decline the offer.
“My consciousness? No. But if you could just do the part that posts tweets and shares bland generic quips in response that would be great.”
This should be the permanent title of this thread.
I’ll kindly ask you to control your abusive impulses and refrain from any posts like this in the future.
Given you are single handedly responsible for 80% of the dumb itt I’m not surprised you took that as an insult.
It wasn’t.
This post was.
If you mean just technically this thread that feels like an angleshoot tbh. The start almost perfectly coincidentally corresponds to when I came back after a 14 month hiatus (lol).
But no, I wasn’t personally insulted. My statement was literal. You are abusive, because you do not want a site with no moderation, yet, you refer to discussions about moderation as “dumb”. That is textbook abusive behavior.
I’d go further and say that what’s really contributed to the problems are abusers like yourself not just being abusive, but, being so casually abusive. But this is veering into Bickering about Old Drama so I’m fine to just leave it there.
Why is a user who doesn’t participate here any more using mod powers to edit a 3-year-old post of mine?
On Unstuck I’ve had a threat made against my IRL reputation as it relates to my career, been doxxed by full name twice, and had my initials posted repeatedly. Most of this was in the past, but my name was posted again a couple days ago. My old username is linked to my real name when searched on Google, so I had asked since changing it that people not use it and edited it to ‘cuse’ when they do.
As a result of the flare up recently, I dug up another round of old posts that mentioned my username to edit, particularly looking for ones in About Unstuck but taking care of others if I found them. All that’s been changed is that one word to a shortened version of it.
Here’s some additional context:
Commonwealth’s old username is linked to his real name on Google because he literally has an updated blog on 2p2 with that information.
That is what Chads was doing, he was trolling the ridiculousness of all this. He wasn’t “doxxing” and those two things are at odds with each other.
(And yes, I’ve said he mighta shoulda get a little tempban for trolling {probably not as long as a week though} because I don’t think trolling is great in any capacity; I think it’s much better in all circumstances to broach a topic directly and sincerely; perhaps he thought that option wasn’t available though)
Because it is ridiculous.
For the love of all that is holy just put “cur***r” behind the profanity filter!
The fact that this hasn’t happened is like kiddie game obvious this is all about something else.
Should have just linked to the relevant twoplustwo post, then.
So cuse is still posting on 2+2 as crounder and expects to not be referred by it here? Ya that’s pretty ridiculous imo. His real name on the other hand should obviously not be allowed regardless of the fact he openly divulged it to all of us.
you don’t think that would have been deleted too, for reasons?
Poll to vote on Commonwealth’s moderator status here:
LINK TO COMMONWEALTH MODERATOR POLL A few posters have recently noted that @anon38180840 remains a mod despite not actively participating in the site anymore. After I posted this: This is something I’ve not paid attention to (because I don’t view myself as a mod or having any other kind of authority), but I think you’re right. I don’t think there’s any reason to have a non-user with mod status, and I’m inclined to revoke it. I’ll give the rest of the day for anyone to suggest otherwise. …
It would have at least been different. I like watching drama, but repetitive drama gets boring.
Yes.
Anonymizing users, editing past posts, nuking threads etc should never have been allowed and is bordering on IP theft.
Totally agree.
How hard is it to not post something you don’t want known? Especially given we can edit our posts for some time.