I don’t want to do a non-apology apology so I won’t.
That said, I’m glad you and others are posting here again.
I don’t want to do a non-apology apology so I won’t.
That said, I’m glad you and others are posting here again.
Few things:
You’re lying.
I hope this is only directed at @WichitaDM because the good grace of me entertaining you in conversation is a speck in the rearview mirror.
He/we didn’t lose money shorting bitcorn, it was APEcoin, and there’s a huge difference between shorting a volatile news-driven short/medium-time-frame event, and shorting a non-volatile long-time-frame macro trend (I broke even but w/e same concept, it was supposed to be a money bag for us). This could’ve all been discussed in that thread if any of you were actually serious about or capable of discussing things instead of mocking and bullying, but you’re not, hence #2.
I don’t want to do a non-apology apology so I won’t.
https://thumbs.gfycat.com/FailingDescriptiveGalago-max-1mb.gif
Despite my, uh, melodramatic verbosity, I wasn’t asking for your apology and I don’t think you even need to be sorry. Everybody does what they need to do.
I was just trying to discuss something about moderation in the about moderation thread of a discussion forum that I think is hella interesting.
He/we didn’t lose money shorting bitcorn, it was APEcoin, and there’s a huge difference between shorting a volatile news-driven short/medium-time-frame event, and shorting a non-volatile long-time-frame macro trend
Gosh, it’s almost as if I didn’t know Witchita was trading APEcoin or whatever you guys were doing.
This could’ve all been discussed in that thread if any of you were actually serious about or capable of discussing things instead of mocking and bullying
This is literally all you ever contribute to this hellsite. As it turns out, your habit of making new accounts to get around everyone’s ignore filter has done something positive for once, so thanks?
Somebody needs to help me out with what that “this” is even referring to.
I think he might be referring to the fact that yesterday there appeared to be a tiny seedling of reconciliation trying to poke its head above the ground and you decided to try to smash it back into the ground and pour battery acid on it for some reason.
Seriously, any dear readers, just filter everything you’ve ever heard Trolly and Co say about The Drama™ through the mind-bottling absurdity of this quote below:
your habit of making new accounts to get around everyone’s ignore filter
I think there’s too much history for reconciliation to be possible in full public view but I did have a positive PM recently with someone that I’d thought couldn’t have happened, so on a one-to-one basis some things may be possible.
I don’t see why it’s not possible. Literally the only thing preventing it is peoples egos.
You may be right but I hope not. Glad to hear about the PM though.
I don’t see why it’s not possible. Literally the only thing preventing it is peoples egos.
Asked and answered, very concise summary there.
As Keeed was talking about recently, true reconciliation will require the work of discussing things.
mind-bottling absurdity
Lol who would ever even think of that?
I’ve never used the ignore function ever, I think it’s an insane function to even exist, I don’t know how it works, and it would never even cross my mind to try to reverse engineer somebody seeing my posts. Holy fuck how could Trolly think I really wanted him et al to see my posts?!?
Somebody needs to help me out with what that “this” is even referring to.
It doesn’t make sense to quote a valid point to argue you make no contribution, so I don’t know. Misquote maybe?
I think he might be referring to the fact that yesterday there appeared to be a tiny seedling of reconciliation trying to poke its head above the ground and you decided to try to smash it back into the ground and pour battery acid on it for some reason.
Hey look it’s my abuser.
Btw, I voted yes in your poll and thought it a fine idea, but considering this post you just made I’m not sure what you imagine happening.
As Keeed was talking about recently, true reconciliation will require the work of discussing things.
guys hear me out reconciliation but without all that annoying reconciling itll be a smash hit
your habit of making new accounts
An inevitable result of overzealous moderation.
to get around everyone’s ignore filter
A trivial side-effect, but if you really need someone to blame, see above.
Lol I don’t know how many proof-of-concepts you all need but they’re perpetual motion machines at this point:
I think he might be referring to the fact that yesterday there appeared to be a tiny seedling of reconciliation trying to poke its head above the ground and you decided to try to smash it back into the ground and pour battery acid on it for some reason.
Clovis, aside from the post to Trolly (an exception which should be obvious) I don’t agree with your characterization at all; in fact in the case of the post to Econophile, I’d say it’s the opposite. Which posts do you think were smashing battery acid on the ground?
On the one hand, you can’t really resolve interpersonal conflicts without talking about them.
On the other hand, I kinda doubt you can resolve interpersonal conflicts with internet strangers by talking about them (at least usually).
The only solution, therefore, is to use emotes
Look, you guys can’t all have green avatars.