I mean, it seems kinda clear to me.
yeah prety clearâŚ
Instead of funneling money to rebuild Gaza or to the failed UNRWA, the international community can assist in the costs of resettlement, helping the people of Gaza build new lives in their new host countries.
Victory is an opportunity for Israel in the midst of crisis - opinion - The Jerusalem Post
the israeli minister of intelligence says itâs ethnic cleansing
1 Like
Everyone in Hamas dead, no matter the collateral damage. If you want fewer civilian casualties, propose a different way to kill everyone in Hamas. Ceasefires donât kill Hamas, so thatâs not going to happen and I wouldnât bother calling for one.
They are not even trying to keep it a secret - a humanitarian crisis is fine (even good) so long as it hurts both Hamas and civilians.
Israelâs trolley problem: 1 civilian and 1 Hamas or 20 civilians and 2 Hamas
Except by levelling hospitals they are creating more hamas members every day. Its like 20 civilians dead equals 2 more hamas members not 2 fewer.
2 Likes
this is what passes for discussion in some channels. itâs rigt there in between denial and justification of a possible genocide, and gets brought up in the context of anti-jewish pogroms and cleansing from other muslim countries. not going to discuss this further, it is incredibly triggering
1 Like
The goal is clearly no more anything in Gaza, so that if there are new militants, they will be another countryâs problem.
Has anyone even come up with a good idea for hurting Hamas that doesnât result in a humanitarian crisis?
Full Israeli occupation has to be better than current situation. UN could distribute aid under Israeli protection so Hamas canât steal.
Of course this will lead to serious risks for Israeli soldiers - which is why they want to force Arab nations to do the occupation.
Also not saying this is ideal, just better than current not allowing aid since it might (predominantly) goes to Hamas.
Bibi dispatched his Mossad chief Yossi Cohen and the IDFâs officer in charge of Gaza, Herzi Halevi, to Doha to beg the Qataris to continue to send money to Hamas back in 2020.
Maybe not do that anymore.
2 Likes
Letâs rephrase that. Has anyone come up with a good idea for killing all or most of Hamas that doesnât result in a humanitarian crisis?
Whatâs the long-term plan there? I donât see that as an option unless your plan is a permanent occupation.
Occupation seems to be the standard operating procedure for the past 50 years or so.
It depends on whether you think occupation is an accurate description after the 2005 disengagement.
So far it sounds like permeant direct occupation as opposed to the indirect occupation with Hamas running it directly or ethnic cleansing sounds like the two options on the table
Israel withdrew its troops and settlers in 2005, though it retained control over its airspace, shared border and shoreline. The UN still considers the territory to be occupied by Israel.
A completely free Gaza gets zero water and electricity from Israel, even for humanitarian reasons.
would they need it if their own infrastructure isnât destroyed as soon as they get it operational?
that isnât necessarily rhetorical. if an independent gaza pre-razing had the use of itâs own waters and infrastructure including airports, do we know what they could or couldnât sustainâŚ
I have no idea, but if they can, have fun in the period before you get that up and running.