Do you think reading “history” as a series of poorly labeled anecdotes with extremely unprofessional (if history is your profession) commentary and extracting sentences from books with no context while not discussing anything else is a proper way to learn “history”? Or is that the actual definition of propaganda, that you ironically came to this thread to rile against?
After linking that page and somewhat admitting this is your education about the subject, along with the fact that you came to discuss framing and dehumanization via propaganda, how do you describe the level of your faith? Bad? Good? Avergish?
Do you really think those are palestinian kids in cages or you are literally the exact same troll as the other side shown by just about every post you posted here? Or perhaps we shouldnt follow “Orthodox Canonist”
That’s my point to begin with. Every single thing you posted was useless propaganda. From your 4th grade infographics to your anti semitic links claiming my grandparents escaping the holocaust were “illegal immigrants” and “israel is a pedophile haven”.
I mean you’re not much of a challenge, but it took very little time to expose it. Just imagine how problematic it is when people are a bit smarter than you are attempt to do it.
Do you think that is the video in the picture? What’s the purpose of having a conversation where you just lie?
You’ve just shown that useless propganada can easily be answered with useless propaganda. Now i’ll show a video of a lynch in Ramallah and you’ll show a video of a dead baby and literally no one will gain anything. And again, the irony is that you stated that this is a method used and rallied against it. Then you linked a page doing exactly that and now linking twitter screenshots doing exactly that.
The level of Dunning-Krueger ITT is really something else. I am a complete dunce on the subject of Israel/Palestine and I know enough to know that dropping “1967 borders” while presuming to lecture someone from the left should make a trapdoor open under you.
Sorry for the double answer, but this thread is a good example of what not to do. Reading a grocery list of atrocities mixed with out-of-context stuff and pure lies on reddit is exactly how one gets shieled into a “one sided” view. Even if you read “both lists” or something.
I don’t either, and like you I am not well versed in the history of the conflict, but a common thread among terrible political ideas is wanting someone else to not exist. This is a thread that runs through relatively trivial municipal matters like the conflict for space on the road between bikes and cars (CYCLISTS DON’T BELONG ON THE ROAD! CARS SHOULD BE BANNED!) to full on genocidal global conflicts (ISRAEL SHOULDN’T EXIST! WIPE PALESTINE OFF THE MAP!). When someone’s idea of a solution to a political or social or economic conflict is that one side should just be eliminated and presto the problem is gone, then you know that’s a bad idea.
I don’t always agree with you viewpoints, but I really appreciate your posts and I usually learn something from them more times than not. So thanks and I hope you and your loved ones stay safe.
