LOL that was a massive reach. Honestly every time they try to smear Warren Iām left thinking āif thatās all theyāve got theyāve got nothing.ā
I love that all future versions of Trumpās wiki page will contain a link to Sharpie.
Yeah Biden is probably done thank god.
Iām not sure Iād trust reports of Bidenās demise from a Fox Business reporter.
Iām thinking heās done because heās a terrible candidate, and his terribleness is going to be front and center on the news every day for the rest of the primary because of the Trump thing. Thereās no reading more charitable for his sons Ukrainian adventures than āit wasnāt criminal at allā. Which it wasnāt. Who cares?
Heās also a bad debater, a bad campaigner, massively out of step with the times, and basically doesnāt have a single good quality left in his dotage. He shouldnāt have run, which is why Obama tried to talk him out of it.
Iād feel sorry for him if he didnāt deserve it so badly. The walking talking definition of a mediocre entitled old white male Boomer. Heās such a sexist that he honestly thought that HRCās big reason for losing to Trump was that she was a woman. Nope-- she lost because the American people are sick to death with people just like him. Weāve probably had our last āestablishmentā Boomer president. And thatās not a bad thing.
Liz, whatās going on with your kitchen decorating!?! And the three similar but not identical rugs? I have questions.
The Democratic Elite accidentally taking Trump down despite not really wanting to is the Chefās Kiss of all of this.
Has there ever been a candidate in either party whoās won both IA and NH and then not won the nomination? I donāt think there has been.
This is an interesting question
I know itās not what you asked but Wiki says Clinton lost both in 92
Edmund Muskie won both in 72
Interesting, and fairly recent. Guess the wiki on that race may be worth reading
I mean, why should I bother speaking to someone who has already canceled me? Thereās no way to rationally argue with that. Vic thinks I donāt belong in the Democratic party (which is weird because I thought their whole spiel was that the DNC and democratic party was terrible).
I obviously have completely failed trying to communicate here. The self-styled āprogressiveā wing of this party has decided that there are actually only two issues that make someone progressive (on one of which their stance is actually REgressive, lol) and anyone else is a goddamned republican and may as well fuck off and die.
There is no nuance allowed, just their way or the highway. Iām too busy talking to open-minded people about Pete to continue banging my head against the wall here.
I wonder what would happen if I posted walls of Pete tweets and news like smacc does with Bernie stuff. Notice I donāt comment on those, even though I disagree with a lot of it. I highly doubt the Pete stuff that I think is brilliant will get the same consideration here, so I use my energy elsewhere.
Why is this post we really need to get ppl like Pete outā¦ and not we really need to get ppl like Pete, Harris, Beto?, Booker? out of the party. Itās a strange vendetta against one candidate, Iām guessing 80% of the field and probably 90% of Democrat in congress arenāt for single payer yet.
I know you know this, but most of the posters on this site are not progressive. Many are radical. A good portion of them are former Republicans or other things that now want to rail on Democrats. Just like they did when they werenāt Democrats. They donāt speak for people who have been far left lifelong Democrats, the people who have actually been marginalized in the party forever. This place is totally niche and doesnāt represent really anything going on overall.
by the way, if anyone lives in Northern California and still has an open mind, Pete is having a rally in West Sacramento on Sunday. Free RSVP at the bottom.
https://secure.peteforamerica.com/onlineactions/tQLBMQ8FcEeSaapYLGoEmA2