US withdrawal from Syria and the Turkish invasion of Rojava

https://www.hawarnews.com/en//mobile/

Can someone explain the reasoning behind how this will lead to the resurgence of ISIS?

Aside from the 10000 ISIS prisoners who will likely be freed, the SDF was the group actually defeating ISIS and no one else in the region, including Turkey, is really capable of that.

Turkey can destroy cities, but not jihadism. The SDF was part of the society, has local support, and can far more effectively deal with terrorist groups. They have little defense against bombers and not much against tanks though.

And more war and destruction will breed more radicalism and terrorism.

The reasoning?

Trump wants his money from his property in Istanbul.

Erdogan is fighting inside Turkey as well and there are people going back and forth. He may also want to send millions of Syrians back and thinks this helps make that happen. Maybe it does.

3 Likes

It does seem odd that Kurds can defeat ISIS but Turkey doesnā€™t have the means to defeat ISIS yet Turkey is wiping out ISIS

Is there any possible explanation other than:

  1. Putin owns Trump

  2. Trump gets money from Turkey real estate

?

Fuck Tulsi

1 Like

You mean the Northern Syrians (theyā€™re not all Kurds), right?

Itā€™s like how we could defeat Saddam Hussein in a few weeks, the official Taliban govt in literally a few hours, and really canā€™t ā€œwinā€ ever. Also Turkey can destroy the SDF in Syria, but canā€™t really beat the PKK inside Turkey.

1 Like

Are the Kurds and Israelis the only Middle Eastern peoples on whose behalf you guys advocate US military intervention?

Who are you talking to and on which side do you think they advocate intervention in Israel?

1 Like

Everyone in this thread or who happens into the thread.

and iā€™d considered that might be an omission Iā€™d have to clarify.

but the US is never intervening in any real way against Israel in favor of the Palestinians.

I posed the question because it seems quite the coincidence weā€™re all justifying further entanglement, after just last week revisiting our advance objections to the Iraqi wars.

I donā€™t want a history lesson or nuance, I honestly wonder if those 2 peoples are our legit only middle eastern allies in a moral sense.

1 Like

so let me get this straight congress with this news they are upset over are gonna pass a ban on military buying from turkey that is controlled by the executive branch to not do business with turkey and sanctions that are again controlled by the executive branch while still nobody thought to move of all those nukes we have in turkey.

1 Like

Do you know the difference between intervention and leaving a few hundred troops in place who were not fighting, but serving as a peacekeeping force?

No one has suggested that the intervention, like the bombing of Raqqa, was something that the US should be doing.

And, Israel is not militarily engaged in a moral cause.

And preventing an invasion from Turkey is not anything like assisting in the occupation of Gaza and the WB.

If you canā€™t tell the difference between an intelligent moral foreign policy vs. isolationism vs. imperialism vs. regime change then thatā€™s on you.

2 Likes

right

someoneā€™s feeling a bit defensive just one week removed from sharing their anti-war bona fides.

Iā€™m not saying we shouldnā€™t move the nukes, because we should as part of an intelligent nuclear disarmament, but of all the ā€œthis is what Putin wantsā€ thingsā€¦this is what Putin wants.

Again, if you canā€™t tell the difference and understand that this movement of troops, the one that is immediately leading to war is not anti-war, then thatā€™s on you. Iā€™m not anti-war because Iā€™m some America Firster who just thinks we have no business being involved in the world. Iā€™m anti-war because I donā€™t want innocent people getting murdered, which is what this is already leading to.

I simply asked if there were 2 allies in that region that warrant our unconditional help, and you couldnā€™t answer.

Scheme like Kissinger thread title change asap

Iā€™m anti intervention in general, but when youā€™ve made agreements with international partners you should stick to them imo. I mean itā€™s not like we were in the middle of an invasion that he called off. We were the only thing between them and complete annihilation and we chose the latter

Iā€™d much prefer just letting them relocate here to like Wyoming or their choice of Dakotas en masse if thatā€™s what it takes to keep them alive but I donā€™t get to choose that option.

9 Likes

We should have carved out Kurdistan when we had the chance but that ship has also sailed

First lol. Youā€™re playing games. You didnā€™t simply ask something.

No one deserves unconditional help. Thatā€™s not what a small peacekeeping force is. And literally no one on this forum is a hawk for Israel and you know that so your question was disingenuous bullshit.