I will spend my whole life being mystified by the seemingly clear consensus that reading a book and then watching its on-screen adaptation is the superior consumption order. People are just setting themselves up to hate the on-screen product as a result of its relative brevity and the cuts required to get it there. On the other, the movie/TV → book pipeline is one where you get the extended director’s cut of a story that you presumably liked enough to keep pursuing it in another medium. To me that’s easily the better way if you’re going to take in both.
Going TV > book might be the better way but that’s not realistic when most of the books came out 20+ years ago and people were reading them long before the TV adaption was a possibility. Those are usually the people that complain the most about on screen stuff. Big fans that have been in love with a story for half their lives see it put on screen and it sucks/is mediocre and can’t possibly live up to thousands of pages of text.
I never thought of all this.
In addition, by watching the movie first, I know how all of the book characters look.
Some people want the feeling of superiority that comes from being a fan of something before it’s popular. It’s okay to not be fan of a band until they have hits, then check out their back catalog from before they were famous. It’s okay to watch a TV show or movie without even knowing there was a book it was adapted from.
I only look down on the people who would never read a book at any point.
- What DUCY said
- Generally (not always) the book is the superior version. So by watching the movie you’re essentially exposing yourself to a bunch of spoilers before you get to the best version.
I agree that book first does set you up to hate the movie (or not like it much). But movie first generally ruins all sorts of subtleties in the book.
Meh, I avoid spoilers if it can be helped, but good works hold up well to repeat viewing (often even improving on second or third watch), when a person is obviously fully spoiled. It only really has a significant ruinous effect on Shyamalan gimmick shit. I definitely don’t accord a ton of weight to this aspect, as I don’t think it matters that much when the spoiler happens.
Obviously when it’s not truly a choice as in the scenario DUCY outlined, I don’t have any argument against the order that life has already chosen for you. And I’ve certainly done book first myself. I just don’t think it’s at all optimal.
The issue with this is that many of the book to movie adaptations are plot-driven and watching the movie take two hours to spoil a forty hour reading experience’s ending isn’t optimal.
S3 was terrible, total waste of Steve Zahn
totally agree, I love that guy but I didn’t buy a thing he was selling, right down to perhaps the worst-looking wig in modern television history
WTF takes 40 hours to read?
Lots of fantasy series?
I feel like WoT adapts to screen better than other books since it’s more about extravagant world-building than plot or themes. Still, season 1 butchered one of the main characters (Mat), but it looks like they corrected that mistake (new actor even) in season 2. It’s also darker visually in a good way and so far (fingers crossed) they cut down on the teen love drama. I mean I know unsatisfied “book = canon” people can be annoying but it seems like the show runners actually listened to complaints and the show is just better as a result.
Speed reading privilege ITT
Everything Miranda July makes (movies, books, live performances) are very good. She’s one of a kind.
What would you suggest I look at next from them?
I saw that David Attenborough was trending and I feared the worst but actually he’s still on his grind.
https://twitter.com/BBCEarth/status/1697293179291115769?s=20
Say goodnight, Danny.
See you in 30 years, Bro!
Hell yes.
I was working at Borders Books and Music (RIP) when Planet Earth I came out on DVD. It was the most stolen item in the store. While the thieves may not have been fans, their customers were!
From what Ive read, richly deserved. Rot you motherfucker.