“As for the dissents,” Roberts writes, “they strike a tone of chilling doom that is wholly disproportionate to what the Court actually does today–conclude that immunity extends to official discussions between the President and his Attorney General, and then remand to the lower courts to determine ‘in the first instance’ whether and to what extent Trump’s remaining alleged conduct is entitled to immunity.”
Lol, this fuckin’ guy man.
Hey Mr attorney general. I think we should put some polonium in my oppositions spritzer don’t you agree. It sure is nice SCOTUS has made me immune for these kinds of things.
But guys, Scalia and Ginsberg went to the opera together.
Sounds like SCOTUS really wants some serious inquiry into whether an act is official or not!
And in determining what is or is not official conduct, “courts may not inquire into the President’s motives.”
An action is not unofficial, the court adds, just because “it allegedly violates a generally applicable law.”
Just imagine the case law that will be generated after a lame duck Joe Biden starts taken the Vette out to drive for Uber on the weekends.
This is gonna make Trump’s 2nd term REAL interesting
All his subsequent terms, too.
Most powerful country in the world very clearly turning into a second Russia. This is really really bad for the world and I think I regret having kids.
Going to fucking suck. Everything’s going to be an Official Act.
Well hang on we need lower courts to determine whether inciting Dumb Insurrection is an official act or not.
If the road you were on led you to this, of what use was the road
If we have history books in 50 years, imagine how stupid letting this fucking guy run for president again is going to look
Also “wait democrats had the whole government from 2020-2022 and did nothing?”
If we have history books in 50 years the election of year 1BT will be seen as the beginning of the fifth Great Awakening.
Now when people tell you “No one is above the law” you can point to the courts explicitly saying that’s not true.
