The Supreme Court: RIP Literally Everything

In the end the people to blame the most are American voters for not running for office and voting to prevent this. That is how you end up with a corporate Democratic party vs an insane Republican party.

There are many causes, and it’s a complex issue, but at the end of the day America just got high on its own supply.

1 Like

My hypothesis with Roe is that it’s never going to motivate the center. The right can tear it down and not lose any actual votes, despite 70% of the country being pro choice. The people for whom abortion is a top of mind issue when voting chose sides long ago and are deeply entrenched. There is a point where the GOP can go too far and face some blowback. Trump was close honestly. He got them crushed in the 2018 mid terms. Despite Dems running two of the worst candidates of all time they won the popular vote twice. The problem is the gop is putting the systems in place to ensure they maintain power in spite of a populist uprising against an unpopular fascist and that’s what keeps me up at night.

Maybe America is the same it’s always been and the past few decades were the outlier, not a new normal

2 Likes

There are no errors when SCOTUS is in your pocket and dissenting opinions are disenfranchised.

I’m sure I’d love hanging out with him, but this is fucking weak sauce.

https://twitter.com/barackobama/status/1521569658960240642?s=21&t=doLbQCISl2nzLxvQCcyt2Q

As a proponent of a Living Constitution, I don’t really believe in “settled law”.

It’s fine. What do you want him to do?

Codify Roe as law when he campaigned on it and had dem control of all branches of government.

loldems

I think that’s kinda the point. "What do you want Obama to do? Or anyone, at this point.

The game is already over. The things to be done time has already passed.

1 Like

I actually think Griswold is next, before Obergefell.

They didn’t get what they wanted yet, they want a federal ban. Then they’ll need to keep winning to keep the federal ban in place.

3 Likes

Don’t worry, everyone. The true progressives will take it from here!

https://twitter.com/RepSwalwell/status/1521608281969422336?t=yWjYB_J8JaT9rWXB-ovlig&s=19

:clown_face:

Do you really think that this conservative Supreme Court majority wouldn’t find codifying Roe into law to be unconstitutional?

Susan is more qualified than every MSNBC host and contributor

Joe Scarborough, Andrea Mitchell, Chuck Todd and Claire McCaskill lololol we are so fucked

1 Like

Not a lawyer, but I thought I heard that Alito claimed to not be passing judgment on abortion itself, but rather whether the court should be the decider. A federal ban is on the table, so federal legality seems like an option as well. At least, if that’s the majority’s logic, it seems hard to change that point of view later.

@Narrator

1 Like

He can just say that states should be the decider, not the federal government.

That’s what we’ve been saying!