The Supreme Court: RIP Literally Everything

Politics & News
478

How did Thomas rule in Clinton v. Jones anyone recall?

479

ya he cites it in a footnote

480

It was 9-0 against Clinton.

481

relating to above and this, what does this mean? like he lost the case, how does he get to try other arguments? What the fuck system is this?

https://twitter.com/neal_katyal/status/1281230674662432768?s=20

1 Like
482

Mazars 7-2 as well

Trump is going to lose his shit that both the justices he appointed went against him, but will probably just take it out on Roberts since he wrote both

483

He lost 7-2

484

That was rhetorical we all know how that assclown of a worthless joke of a justice ruled in that case.

485

https://mobile.twitter.com/LeahLitman/status/1281230699891249153

486

Sorry, still early. :laughing:

1 Like
487

ummm?

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1281232481862193153?s=20

488

https://mobile.twitter.com/LeahLitman/status/1281232196267839488

489

And there it is. Trump loses the Vance case, but he gets to fight on other issues and it gets sent back to the lower court, where it will take months to play out and nothing is going to happen before the election.

“This is a legal defeat for the president, but it may be a practical victory,” says Jeffrey Toobin.

Same logic applies to the Mazars case, too. Punt to after the election.

3 Likes
490

Sorry non lawbros, but almost always shit doesn’t happen right away when SCOTUS rules, things get remanded and litigated further.

491

Law gonna law. He won by losing.

5 Likes
492

LAWBROS!!! UNCLE BLAZER!!!

4 Likes
493

Sorry lawbros, but the Democrats didn’t force the issue into the courts as quickly as possible, the courts didn’t weigh the importance of the American people learning of the outcome of these investigations before the election, and thus the entire system is failing the electorate and protecting the president.

But, hey, we’ll probably get to see some of this stuff in mid-2021, which it is completely fucking irrelevant to our political landscape. Yay!

494

This is like when the Supreme Court “remanded” the 2000 recount back to the Florida Supreme Court knowing they had no time to actually do the recount in the allotted time.

495

Perhaps PAULA JONES should have asked for the tax returns

2 Likes
496

FYI Congress’s subpoena power was just affirmed and corporate Democrat Jerry Nadler still sitting on his hands and refusing to issue subpoenas

8 Likes
497

Like a lawbro dunking on the non lawbros right now is just so fucking chefskiss.gif.