geography is a legit data science though, and plenty of geography phds have coding skills.
Itās a science involving data. āData scientistā is a specialist field under the domain of computer science, involving expertise in programming focused around data analysis and machine learning. Though Iām sure the reporters calling her a data scientist have no idea what it means.
Yeah, referring to a geographer as a ādata scientistā would be really weird. If thatās the case then all scientists are data scientists, since all scientists are concerned with data of some sort.
Iāve heard the term thrown around where processing huge, hard to analyze data sets are a big part of the work. Certainly lots of geographers are doing that. I knew a lot of geography grad students when I was in graduate school and at first I was all wait this is a real thing and then they start talking about their work. A lot of them seemed like pretty good programmers and very computer savvy. Definitely donāt care to argue if they are data scientists or not, mostly just pointing out that geography isnāt necessarily a joke degree.
Although one thing that graduate school taught me is that ANY degree can be a total joke and for sure donāt be impressed by anyoneās letters that come after their name.
Not that Jones has any letters coming after her name, apparently her lol PhD is āin progressā
I mean, the process that you described is literally ETL. Maybe Data Engineer is a more accurate title in your eyes? Then again, I know for a fact that the work associated with the Data Scientist title can vary widely between organizations from basic ETL and analysis, to deriving models from big data for ai/ml. So, this is pretty much just a a boring semantics point.
Worth noting I have a bachelors in geography, have worked as a GIS Analyst, DevOps Engineer, Software Engineer, and Site Reliability Engineer. So I probably have a little bit more sympathy for title inflation.
5 Likes
Itās sort of ETL but I donāt think she did the E or T parts. I canāt be sure exactly what she did but Iām pretty sure her job was āthe GIS personā. In the emails between her and her superiors, the tasks sheās asked to do involve what data is displayed on the dashboard and how itās displayed. The behind the scenes collation and transformation of the data is happening elsewhere.
By all accounts she was pretty good at that part of her job btw, so Iām not meaning to imply sheās totally useless or anything. Itās just that to me, āshe built the COVID dashboard from scratchā implies a bit more than competently using off-the-shelf mapping software to do what she was directed to do.
does anyone else find it disturbing that this dude is clearly adopting the universal āgetting blown under the deskā posture?
https://twitter.com/GeoRebekah/status/1343565605941751815
computer, enhance
No kink shaming
Data scientist is the latest catch-all meaningless buzzword industryspeak job title like business analyst was twenty years ago.
As a data scientist Iām enjoying this conversation
4 Likes
Shots fired.
https://twitter.com/georebekah/status/1344067350216265729?s=21
Might be nice if our team of detectives can dig into Emily Oster.
1 Like
I doubt an economics professor at Brown would put out a paper or data table as embarrassing and nonsensical as the Jones paper you linked to. But Iām sure that weād be happy to look at Osterās work as soon as you respond to the criticism we gave you when you solicited critiques to the Jones paper you linked to.
3 Likes
Sheās not the villain in this drama no matter how bad her math is
Yeah, um, blaming Oster on this raid is some straight-up bullshit.
Not the raid. Where did you get that?
Maybe Iām reading it wrong but that seems to be what sheās saying.
https://twitter.com/GeoRebekah/status/1344067354599239681
Why does Prof. Oster refuse to use The COVID Monitorās data? How can she justify covering up the 1.5 trillion COVID cases that have been linked to schools?! Whoās behind her wicked agenda?? DETECTIVES, ASSEMBLE!
3 Likes
Information questioning motives and methods of Dr Oster is up thread.
Not refuted yet. I just note that we have some detectives in this thread that are good at digging up information on people.
Iām clearly a bad judge of character so I will defer.