One thing I’m curious about is whether a failed impeachment prior to the election could make some percentage of Trump voters think he’s invincible and slightly depress R voter turnout? The timing would have to be right, because if it’s possible, the effect probably wouldn’t last long.
I already do…lol. I’ll be making that one soon…maybe.
No, this is objectively wrong. The idea I’m working on is that we are in a clear and present danger moment. If they don’t act quickly, they’re okay with this because things are obviously not being stopped before they get out of hand (see Syria). This needs to be happening ASAP, and there is a lot of blood on the Dems hands for not doing something sooner.
If you don’t think Trump is a clear and present danger, then sure run it up as long as you want. I think he is. He just completely ceded a major portion of the middle east to Russia/Turkey. He’s been trying to cede Ukraine to Russia. Putin is counting on a low appetite for war, and he’s marching right now. The longer Trump’s in, the harder it will be to make/keep a detente. Trump is an incredible threat to national security both here and for the rest of security around the world. Based on just what has happened in the last 30 days, you for sure don’t want this running up to the election.
I don’t think you really get the concept of objectivity.
Things Rudy Giuliani doesn’t do: a) follow the law b) his duty
If I thought it was subjective, I would say that. Do you believe Trump is an imminent national security threat? If you do, you must impeach immediately or ASAP. If you don’t and think protections are built in (clearly they are not based on what happened in Syria), you do your strategy. Any blood in that situation is on your hands (not you, the people in power).
I don’t know anything about Jr’s life. I hope he’s telling some truth here, he’s not rich, and his dad pays him like $35k/year.
So many heart haters on this site. People act like they are giving away their soul each time the click on a heart.
Trump Golf Fyrefest?
I really appreciate that with almost every witness we get another piece wrapping in another person and solidifying the narration of criminal events.
As an FYI, I think it’s up to about 6 or 7 (can’t think of them off the top of my head, but will research them if desired) people who have said they went to lodge a complaint with Eisenberg or notified him of something. Eisenberg has the credentials to put the documents on the super secret server. The two people most heavily implicated in this outside of all of the usual suspects (Pompeo, Pence, Trump, Perry, Mulvaney) are Sondland and Eisenberg. Volker is also up to his eyeballs, but he came forward first and probably won’t suffer many consequences because of it. Tomorrow is popcorn day with Morrison.
If I thought it was subjective, I would say that. Do you believe Trump is an imminent national security threat? If you do, you must impeach immediately or ASAP. If you don’t and think protections are built in (clearly they are not based on what happened in Syria), you do your strategy. Any blood in that situation is on your hands (not you, the people in power).
Nothing you typed after you told me I was objectively wrong makes sense unless your understanding of objectivity and subjectivity are inverted.
Sigh.
Objectively correct strategy: Go
Objectively incorrect strategy: Not go
Update: Nationals win! (Baseball)
Which adviser?
Edit: It’s Vindman
I suggest we add
11. Natsomancy - divination by whether the Nats win or lose the World Series tonight and by how much.Nats win big, the dotard is getting impeached, possibly removed or loses in a landslide
Nats win small, the dotard is getting impeached, acquitted, but loses the election in a close contest
Astros win small, the dotard is still getting impeached, but acquitted and reelected in a demoralizing replay of 2016
Astros win big, WAAF
Looks like good days ahead
NATS WIN!
him
https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1189258627380588545
Man, please let there be some Schiff vs Nunes asking a witness questions for a half hour.