I’m sure that’s just a coincidence, nothing to see here, please disperse.
To my understanding, it was more than using furniture or overlaying CGI couples. Existing couples were altered with CGI to be less explicit than what they were actually doing.
It’s not like I was on set or present during post-production, so I could be wrong. I’ve just followed the production history ever since it came out.
There are a lot of people who claim to love the constitution who haven’t actually read it. It’s like the Bible that way.
It’s an old operating system and it badly needs a rework.
1 Like
Well they’re trained killing machines so may as well get some profitable use out of them.
Why is it called the Defence Department agian?
1 Like
https://mobile.twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1183040486191312897
https://mobile.twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1183023011080921093
You know what, you’re right. It’s a 2/10 and still felt like the hardest hitting interview I’ve seen in a long time. Just highlights how poorly the media is covering these criminals.
1 Like
https://mobile.twitter.com/chick_in_kiev/status/1182800033655246848
https://mobile.twitter.com/chick_in_kiev/status/1182803964754104320
https://mobile.twitter.com/chick_in_kiev/status/1182861049969762305
https://mobile.twitter.com/chick_in_kiev/status/1182869955253063680
4 Likes
She just killed his insanity defense.
1 Like
That girl has potential.
lol that video was hilarious. Definitely recommend to the thread.
I went out to dinner about a year ago and sat one table next to Golestyn and his party. Close enough to overhear most of their conversation. Getting Trump involved was basically the heart of their defense strategy. So congrats on squeezing that in while he still has some power. This is him.
https://twitter.com/MeetThePress/status/1182773349044408324?s=19
Finally, refusing to air clips of his white power rallies. It’s about time they stopped showing clips of his rhetoric altogether.
1 Like
Reminder that the acting DNI told the intelligence committee that he would never talk about his conversations with the president multiple times in the hearing. Then when asked if the president asked him to do something, he said, ‘no’. The next statement should be, ‘now that you’re willing to talk about conversations you’ve had with the president, let’s go back to…’
Pompeo used ‘I do not talk about personnel matters’, until he got to the Ukraine ambassador. He answered a question about that personnel matter. The next statement should be, ‘now that you’re willing to talk about personnel matters, let’s go back to…’.
I would love to watch them squirm out of that.
1 Like
Are they on their phones or praying?
