I’m ashamed to say I clicked on this. What I found interesting, behind all the BS and misleading and selective quotes in the article was the most upvoted comment. The triumph, as usual, is to trigger the dems. This is like the apotheosis of conservative thought under Trump. I’m not sure what sort of information processing system one would need to come up with this and for it to be the most upvoted comment. I feel that, despite many nobel efforts, the Trumpist psychology has not been adequately explained.
I LOVE IT!
President Trump dropped a giant water balloon on the heads of the Dems when they got together have one of their collective Triggerings !
Trump 4D Chess move Flawless!
The core would seem to be genuine resentment. Why have the dems sought to complicate the world and its natural order? They defend the blacks, the Mexicans, and the gays, hug trees, eat weird shit, probably don’t like beer and BBQ, and don’t love God and the flag. Why can they not appreciate that Trump only wants what is good for real Americans? To be an ass kicker, an alpha, who doesn’t give in to foreigners and liberals. Well, they may bitch and moan like the sissys they are, but at least Trump will show them who is boss.
Like the entire discourse floats above policy, but to the extent it implies policy it is simply cultural grievance and ass-kicking Murica, with maybe some charity for poor souls who aren’t natural born ass kicking Muricans.
I think what has to be behind this sort of thinking is the implicit strong belief in a “natural order” and Trump somehow reflects and embodies that natural order. It seems all gut-level, and not driven by any more abstract considerations about how what is may differ from what could be or much less some ideal. Maybe the real concern is lashing out at people who tell them that what they think and beleive is actually wrong, according to x, y, and z, but they don’t understand or have time for x, y, and z, so they seem to reactively lash out against those who do not embrace their values and implicit understanding of the natural order. One minute they were paddling the pledges and getting drunk and everything was great, and now they’re being told they were in the wrong. Who has the right to judge them, some uppity negro or prius driving fem-man? It wasn’t like that when Murica was great, before the abortionists took over.
Really, I just find the who thing puzzling. I did not find Cory Robin’s The Reactionary Mind overly insightful about the psychology at work here, but I feel like it’s fairly “simple” and should be comprehensible.