She was in a photo shoot when the insurrection started. Some underlings were trying to get her to help convince Trump to make a statement calling off the seditionists. She chose to finish the photo shoot.
9 Likes
I love how these guys always dress alike. Oh black Ts are in this year? Ok. Oh wait now it’s hoodies? Ok.
Bezos has multiple mini-mes who look exactly like him.
The tech word is seriously like high school with money.
1 Like
Correct me if I’m wrong, but Florida Man’s big “repeal section 230” thing would make platforms responsible for the content posted on their sites, right? Aside from making operating their sites untenable, wouldn’t banning everybody espousing violent rhetoric be a necessary result of repealing section 230?
1 Like
Yes, which is why its absurd that GOP is begging for its repeal
3 Likes
I believe the owner recently clarified that he doesn’t expect to be back up in a week and in fact fears this is the end of the platform.
1 Like
I called Greg Dolezal’s office (GA State Senator referenced in below article) to express my displeasure at his behavior subsequent to the election. His staffer cut me off and said “We are no longer taking comments on the election. We are now in a process of unity and healing”, and then hung up on me.
4 Likes
This part of the tweets seems like some bullshit to justify not reporting them to the FBI which of course he needs to do
There are other options besides repeal:
https://twitter.com/matthewstoller/status/1336907840259321861
The GOP wants to selectively enforce these lawsuits to sue social media sites into compliance, or into oblivion like they did with gawker. We should all be terrified of repealing section 230.
When Putin first came to power there was still some free media in Russia. He managed to get some of it shut down, and his cronies bought up the rest. Rs aren’t that stupid. They know exactly what they plan do with a 230 repeal.
2 Likes
god dammit
1 Like
Yeah, and that is because of BOTH SIDES (not yelling at you). Yes, it’s a large majority of Republicans and largish minority of Democrats, but plenty of Dem voters are “not in my neighborhood” “they can come but they need to do it right and learn English” “spend more money on their schools, but we don’t want them in our schools or our kids in theirs” “a hand up is one thing, but these people need to work for it” etc and, of course, tons of Dems have guns and don’t want the government touching them (20% of Dems don’t want to ban assault weapons). Most politicians want money and to get re-elected and that’s it. Half the Dems in congress and half the Rs in congress could change places and policies without causing the least bit of moral struggle for the members.
Benghazi works for both parties. It’s a token.
It’s more than not impeaching.
Pile it all on! It’s deserved.
Tiger woods fan page I follow released a statement claiming that they have been facing some sort of “shadow ban” that throttles the amount of new followers they can get and that’s why the page hasn’t been growing.
It theorized that this happened because they made posts that had tiger and the POTUS in them, lol.
Nah it couldn’t possibly be that there are 40 billion other tiger fan pages, it’s gotta be LIBERAL FREE SPEECH SUPPRESSION
These guys’ victim complexes are limitless.
yeah wisco is tilt/lean R for 24, uh thanks for the lower variance I guess, though I assume that means dems get 2, R’s get 8 locked in.
Come fly with Luftwaffles, where your frequent flyer miles last for a thousand years
11 Likes
In the end it’d be sensationally used once in a while for political things, but 99% of the cases would be people who said mean things about Exxon causing suits or just more quietly cease and desist letters.