He’s wrong, it’s even simpler than that, Senate Majority Leader is a made up position and the Constitution just says “The House of Representatives shall choose their Speaker and other Officers” so there’s nothing stopping someone from holding both positions.
The drawback of withholding the articles is that it takes the urgency argument if the table, especially if you use it as leverage for other things (that they should put much more pressure on, for sure).
Absolutely anything that got the Senate to actually do work would be spectacularly on key. I think a lot of us have trouble remembering that once upon a time legislation got churned out pretty constantly, and that it’s pretty much impossible to keep the government running semi functionally without the government reacting to what’s happening in the real world.
Pivoting back to bills the Senate isn’t passing would be a pro move. Dems have to focus on that shit. The House just approved a bill restoring funding for gun control research —Dems should be bringing attention to this instead of impeachment procedural argle bargle.
I’m not sure. An easy counter is “We will vote on those bills as soon as you allow us to vote on Impeachment.”
And most people will think well that’s fair, let them vote on impeachment wtf.
Dems will be painted as obstructionists and things will go back to the same political theater argle bargle.
I’m sympathetic to anyone who jumps in with the usual refrain to do it anyway, the GOP will respond in bad faith no matter what. That’s a good point, but I just don’t see Dems fighting back in a sustained way that wouldn’t turn such a move against them.