Yeah, she quarantined for 2 weeks before she came over, and we were both completely isolated while she was here. So there was no additional exposure from that.
The Rao is lame, but it is what it is. Opening Arguments podcast will probably cover the details of this accurately. It looks like (probably one of) the judges (Rao) wanted additional briefing on a BS argument. The briefing will be in a sur-reply (opening brief->opposition->reply->sur-reply (disfavored). I think this put a decision out past election day when it was already going to be way out past election day. Rao just wants a roadmap to the BS legal excuse she’ll use to decide the case in Trump’s favor.
Having never commented on the Atlantic story or Trump’s supposed remarks about veterans, Henline was outraged that he was being used as a “prop” to aid the Democratic Party in tearing down Donald Trump to help their candidate, Joe Biden, get elected.
“Go on what you have with facts," Henline said. "If you don’t have the power to win on your own merits, that you have to tear down your opponent, there is a problem there.”
btw the social media posts he’s complaining about are universally, “this guy is a hero and not at all a loser/sucker”
Right, again, it’s not going to be decided in time to matter and that’s kind of the whole point. This whole justice system thing doesn’t really work if one can just punt for 4+ years.
Who was it that posted that letter? The authoritarian can attack you from both sides of an issue with no repercussions and his supporters will cheer and believe him, because he tells it like it is.
I mean seriously must be nice to just say whatever the fuck you want and have some people believe one thing and some people believe the exact opposite and both of them will end up voting for you because of it
Joe should try coming out in favor of M4A, repealing obamacare, the paris climate accord, fracking, open carry, and banning high caliber weapons.
This is one of the downsides of Trump’s particular style of litigation. It only works if you’re an actual billionaire and/or can somehow “convince” the DOJ to defend your rape cases. Few people can afford to seek en banc review for random issues and petition the Supreme Court whenever they lose (much less receive a hearing). This is like the hourly equivalent (averaged out over a few months) of having NBA teams play for you personally.
As much as anything, lawyers bankrupted the NRA.
Hell, I’m currently working with a client whose almost-off-the-ground startup has blown $1M with a biglaw firm (and is now in serious financial distress) to resolve a case that I could have won for $150k.
97% of civil litigation cases settle not because they should, but because clients learn about big boy legal bills.