Probably not as tedious as the 100+ page detour Les Miserables takes to describe the battle of waterloo which if I remember correctly started as one character asking another “what’s up?.” First book I didn’t slog through, and this was while I was a theater nerd and Les Mis was super popular.
It took me a year to read Bleak House. In that same year I also read The Quincunx, which is >1,000 pages long as well. I do not know why I subjected myself to this, but the end result is that I have hopelessly confused the plots of both books while simultaneously being horrified by 19th century England.
My 6th grade teacher gave me a set of Reader’s Digest condensed versions of Dickens.
A Tale of Two Cities might be the only one I’ve read the full version of. I still remember the opening and closing lines over 40 years later. It’s great.
Never been able to get past ch 1 of Moby Dick. Tried several times.
honestly, I never really enjoyed Catcher in the Rye. Maybe because I was never really a disaffected teenaged boy? We didn’t have a word for it then, but man, that book has real incel vibes.
I don’t know why we’re comparing Moby Dick with Dickens. I haven’t read Moby Dick but it sounds terrible. Dickens is great. He wrote actual interesting stories that are enjoyable to read.