Have not actually read any of this, but familiar enough with adjacent discourse to know that this is kind of the pointâstory protagonists often do stupid things in service of a good narrative. Part of the didactic point of the work was that you shouldnât model your actions on fictional heroes, you should ruthlessly exploit whatever edge you have, even if itâs boring reading.
I was legitimately angry in the middle of the last season because I thought it was going completely off the rails and there was no way they would be able to salvage everything and stick the landing. Then they did and I was ashamed for ever having doubted them.
I think thatâs the normal viewpoint. I feel like this speaks more to the strength of S1-2 though. Like there are some objectively mind blowing moments in S3 but they donât really come across that way because your mind is already melted from that one moment in S2. And as a show built around time travel it ends impressively with everything explained. Beyond the obvious impossibility of traveling through time to begin with. Also I donât think they ever said how that bracelet ended up in the cave which bothers me more than it should.
Lot of buzz on Twitter these past few days about Nostr, a potential Twitter killer, but also a fully decentralized thing that works without tokens or blockchains.
âSometimes thereâs this sense that the fact that they profited that much is somehow terrible, and I just donât think thatâs the case,â said Betsy Duke, a former Federal Reserve governor who chaired Wells Fargoâs board until 2020. âAbout everything you could throw at the financial system has been thrown at it in the last 10 years. These banks have not just survived but theyâve actually thrived.â
âyou might look at these numbers and think the banks made too much money, but actually they did a great job because they made a lot of moneyâ - a banker