Should beetlejuice be made admin for life and have droit du seigneur with your daughter?

with a majority of members itt voting to support installing myself as pontifex maximus for life with no stipulated method of removing me, i think it’s EXTREMELY magnanimous of me to accept even a 75% threshold for removal of justices from the court.

i’m wary of this because i don’t want the court to be a political arena where justices are jockeying for support of the crowd instead of making unbiased (and sometimes perhaps unpopular) decisions. if we want to elect a senate to make decisions based on politics, that’s a separate thing. the judiciary should ideally be independent of that noise. a small council of respected forum members with mild autism who can make independent judgements in the best interest of the community is what we need.

5 Likes

I want to grow support for this concept to higher levels and i welcome discussion about how to improve the finer points to achieve more support, but considering the proposal as written has garnered a majority approval, we should fine tune what I’ve written instead of rewriting the concept from scratch.

Associate justices can be recalled by vote at which level?
  • 51%
  • 66%
  • 75%
  • 85%
  • 90%
  • Associate justices serve for life
  • Associate justices can be put up for a recall vote only with unanimous consent of the other serving justices on the court

0 voters

i don’t think there is widespread support for a chief justice/associate justice structure

i support a structure with 3 equal arbiters

1 Like

My concern is that you’d have to be Literally Hitler to garner enough support for a 2/3rds threshold.

Candidates for associate justice will be nominated by
  • The admin (majority vote if >1 admin)
  • The admin (unanimous if >1 admin)
  • The pontifex maximus
  • Anyone
  • Anyone + at least one serving mod

0 voters

Candidates for associate justice will be confirmed by a popular vote greater than:
  • 50%
  • 66%
  • 75%
  • 85%
  • 90%

0 voters

We can work out the responsibilities of the pontifex maximus in here and stipulate them clearly in the full referendum.

Ultimately I feel there will be one among the justices who will handle organizational matters wrt the subforum

1 Like

I really wanted to answer 80% for this!

1 Like

That’s a fair point

Not sure how to answer this. I really like the idea of there being only 3 and that they be as impartial as possible and supported by a large majority of the community. I’d like turnover to be as little as possible in this position and likely only come from one of the three no longer wanting the job.

2 Likes

This might be the nerdiest thing I’ve ever seen in my life.

Daria had an episode where her parents created a family court as a way to punish their children for bed behavior. In the end, the system was so bad that the parents were being punished by the process and stopped it before the episode ended.

That’s how this will end. It’ll be another thing for trolls and drama queens to bitch and moan about until people wake up and drop this idea.

3 Likes

That’s why only beetlejuice is qualified to be chief justice. People would feel so bad bothering him and diverting him away from his other posting duties that they would only use the process when they feel very aggrieved.

3 Likes

with me as pontifex maximus, this forum will be respected again. the other forums are laughing at us right now with our current leadership. it’s a travesty, and only i can fix it.

7 Likes

and look, we’re not gonna get riverman to do it, ok? no one (willing to do this) is more widely respected (and, frankly, adored) than me.

6 Likes

5 Likes

So this is winning by a small but comfortable margin. Three more days and then poll officially closes, and if the lead holds the judicial branch becomes Official Forum Law. Exciting!

I’d be curious to hear the perspective of the no voters. Is it anything other than just thinking it’s not needed?

1 Like

Yeah, this.

I don’t support giving beetlejuice admin rights to the site, at least not without further discussion of why he would need that.

That isn’t a good idea unless there’s a much larger community vote with more consensus.

That’s about the only thing I’ll stand very firm on - the admin permission is extremely powerful.

Personally I’d be extremely uncomfortable with it and it’s not because of beetlejuice, I just think it sets bad precedent