To be clear, when they say they are leading by 53%, they mean they are up 53-47. I don’t find these figures comforting. 60% on Election Day votes for Trump in those states seems easily doable.
1 Like
“This tweet is unavailable”
If I may be honest, I have often wondered what alcohol I might better appreciate were I to drink it for something other than going blotto. I will take your word for it that the blend is smooth and exceptional :)
how do i unlike a post? :(
DON’T FLAG IT!!!
1 Like
Just a typo. He posted it again corrected.
With that said, this will definitely be appealed right?
I follow him and he’s never been FOS yet.
Here’s the correction
https://twitter.com/JuddLegum/status/1323360820869373955
https://twitter.com/JuddLegum/status/1323361098813374467
8 Likes
Scottish ;)
judge probably should have slow-rolled it for a few hours
Yeah I’m not implying he is, just that the case will likely be appealed.
And really the standing issue is a lot less likely to be overturned on appeal than a decision on the merits IMO. It’s odd that they didn’t name Trump as a plaintiff in the case. Or at least a local candidate.
Edit: nvm, the standing issue brought up by the judge doesn’t really seem like it would be resolved by swapping out plaintiffs
1 Like
Johnny Walker Black Label is the Japanese car maker of whiskys or the German tools for whisky… They just work.
2 Likes
The foot in the door is the judge is requiring the names of anyone who votes via drive through to be recorded so if it does get appealed they could resolve it after the election
5 Likes
https://twitter.com/RMFifthCircuit/status/1323361252786266113
In addition to not having standing the judge said even if they did he would have ruled against them
6 Likes
I’d like to appeal this ruling.
Never mind, judge shot me down from the bench
1 Like
I wonder it these judges that are generally awful by nature, but are awful under relative anonymity, do feel a bit of social pressure when the eyes of the nation are on them.
3 Likes
Submit your brief! But be brief.