On the Origins of Covid

[anon10396289]

@CaffeineNeeded

Frankly, I shouldn’t be wasting my time with a dishonest, uneducated and obviously not here to learn person like you. This is day five of you posting straight up garbage. Yesterday you went all in on them finding the animal right away when new literature showed they didn’t find it until 2017. You should be embarrassed, but you don’t seem capable of it.

Again, a blatant and obvious lie. I said they found the animals likely responsible for transmitting it at the market right away:

@anon10396289

CIDRAP

Animals in Chinese markets carried SARS-like virus

(CIDRAP News) Chinese scientists found that animals sold at street markets in Guangdong, China, carried a coronavirus nearly identical to the SARS coronavirus, according to a report published recently in Science.

They’ve tested huge numbers of animals for covid in and around Wuhan and come up empty.

You said that they didn’t know what the identity of the animal that was the natural reservoir. Which is true, as I and the paper I quoted both acknowledged. But that was irrelevant, I said they identified the likely culprit at the market right away, and they did:

@anon10396289

jesus christ the Science paper says that they don’t know what the actual natural reservoir for Sars is, just that they detected sars in animals and the human animal traders. You don’t even have to read the whole paper, just the abstract. Which is like eighty words long.

But the fact that you’re telling me to read wikipedia rather than a peer reviewed article is pretty funny.

So the point I was making is obvious and I’m sure you understood it: with Sars, they immediately identified the virus in animals at the market and the animal traders that trafficked them. You’re knowingly lying about what I wrote. Because you’re a liar.