**Official** Physicists are freaks and very weird dudes LC Thread

From a practical standpoint, I retain information better if I read it vs hear it. Even when it comes to movies and TV shows that I watch, I remember plots and quotes and minor details from remembering reading about them rather than remembering watching them.

This looks interesting. Iā€™ll give him a shot.

1 Like

You may need to buzz through the first 10 minutes or so of the first lecture because he is doing some intro/housekeeping. And the further that you get into the series the more heā€™s built foundational layers and is advancing into higher level concepts.

Lecture #24, which is labeled ā€œSchizopreniaā€, is actually about far more than just that, and was my favorite one. Specifically, because heā€™s talking about the underlying human behavioral biology that leads to what he terms as ā€œschizo-typalā€ behavior, and how it relates to the people that have existed within cultures throughout history who become the shamans, or religious, or spiritual leaders.

1 Like

Same! Absolutely amazing series, fully recommend.

1 Like
2 Likes

This guy is so easy to listen to. Halfway through and I donā€™t think there has been a single ā€œumā€ā€¦

1 Like

Iā€™m the same way. Iā€™d rather spend 10 minutes reading something than 30 minutes having some someone read it to me.

Itā€™s interesting how people learn differently. I remember in school if something was covered in the lecture I would get it right. Couldnā€™t remember much of what I read though.

1 Like

Itā€™s why I think racism will always be a part of our culture. Some people are just visual learners and will always rely on visual cues for social behavior because you canā€™t train them to treat people based on anything other than what people look like. Maybe you can train them to consider clothing or hair more than skin, but those things still correlate to race in ways that make relying on them problematic.

my attention span is maximum 10 minutes. 30 minutes if I concentrate really, really hard.

Its a skill that can be developed by practice. Its very hard though given contemporary internet stimulus, but it can be worked on.

Learn to read faster.

maybe, but I have ADHD. Not that it is an excuse but things that seem simple for most people can be extraordinarily difficult for me, if not impossible.

Iā€™ve adapted by being good at juggling several tasks at once. Itā€™s like the only way I can function at all. It helps if I have something like talk radio in the background to keep my mind on while i work.

I hear you, sorry I didnā€™t mean to suggest it was strictly a lack of willpower. I have personally struggled with my attention span because my work has shifted over time from focused time to managing email blizzards. Its really damaged my ability to focus, but Iā€™ve clawed back some of it with practice.

Nah you didnā€™t. Whenever I mention it though people are always like, ā€œyou just need to try harderā€ or ā€œyou need to do meditationā€ or even ā€œjust be present.ā€ Things like that. Itā€™s hard for people to understand that my brain just does not work correctly, so I just always throw it in there.

I am trying to get into meditation and stuff for better focus, but I will frequently forget what the hell Iā€™m doing like 30 seconds into it, so it always feels pointless.

My work also has periods of long lulls and then intense activity - and I get interrupted by IMā€™s a lot. Previously, I could focus at work because of the social pressure of wanting to look/seem productive (even if you werenā€™t). Iā€™m the type of person that would rather just work than pretend to work. But, given the nature of my job, the slow pace, and working from homeā€¦ yea itā€™s just been a perfect storm of attention deficit.

For me itā€™s mostly a matter of tricking my brain into getting hyper focused on the correct thing, but it always goes ā€œoooo this is way more interesting than the thing youā€™re supposed to be doingā€

2 Likes

This is widely believed. It makes sense. I thought so too. But itā€™s not true. Or at best the evidence is mixed. Like arguing about the best diet for weight loss.

Iā€™m not really following. Can you explain this over video chat for me?

1 Like

Haha. Iā€™m not saying people donā€™t have preferences.

Iā€™d rather Sabine Hossenfelder explain a physics concept in a video than dig it out of a dusty textbook. Fasting combined with other strategies worked for me to lose weight. Ymmv

I could see this being something we are told and just believe without any real science behind it.

On the other hand I think one major problems with education is this one size fits all approach.

I think if you have certain neurological deficits (like ADHD) then visual vs listening may be huge for your learning. For instance, I took a formal test that measured my response times and accuracy by clicking a button every time I saw the word ā€œoneā€ or heard someone say the word ā€œone.ā€ It was seemingly very simple but I didnā€™t do well.

The report was pretty in depth and it noticed that I had far worse accuracy and response time scores on the visual prompts than the auditory ones, which suggested (according to the report) that I may process auditory information better. Which is funny because previously, I would have said visual.

1 Like