Moderation

Gimmicks are allowed, and that poster is not a gimmick.

TIL zaraprochka isn’t a gimmick account

1 Like

More like you took a big shit yourself and then stepped in it.

1 Like

If somebody had their account anonymized it was presumably for a good reason and people should stop openly speculating about it because that kind of defeats the purpose.

1 Like

It wasn’t clear at the time of posting that his account had been anonymised; only that he had renamed it.

Sorry, changing topics—I have reached the Discourse level where I can change titles. I will be changing any titles that contain ā€œshitā€, ā€œfartā€, ā€œassā€ and similar words. They are cringeworthy, puerile and beneath the level of discourse of this site. If that is unacceptably presumptuous of me then I will desist.

8 Likes

Please do it. And you don’t really need to notify others of your intentions, polite as it was - a consensus will emerge.

I don’t really care either way but this is a weird streak of puritanical adherence to clean language that has never made any sense to me. The word fuck can be kinder than the word love. It’s all context.

When it’s in a large bold font that colleagues and children will see, it’s not about Puritanism.

2 Likes

I strongly agree with jal. Topic titles are the public face we present to the world and reflect on the entire community.

Fart is the standard expression in the UK, but ā€œTrumpā€ used to be used as a more polite expression when I was growing up. Don’t know if that is countrywide though as I haven’t head it so much since I moved South

3 Likes

Chaucer and Shakespeare are full of people farting. The prudish Victorians liked to pretend bodily functions and needs didn’t exist, but we’re getting over that now.

It’s a word we use - but we tend to talk about the weather more than farting - is it a common topic of conversation in the US?

… but there is this guy …

s-l300

6 Likes

What does ā€œslow modeā€ mean? I’m trying to de-escalate a thread I haven’t posted in for 30 minutes and I’m being prevented from posting at all.

https://unstuckpolitics.com/t/you-need-to-wait-an-hour-between-posts-in-this-topic/3092/4

1 Like

My genuine feedback is that an hour is too long. Give people 10 minutes to think through their posts and self-regulate before responding, but an hour just shuts things down at the peak of tension and leaves people walking away with a negative experience.

We want people to de-escalate and re-engage via good-faith conversation. Not to shut things down while everyone still has a bad taste in their mouths.

IMO.

1 Like

The only way to de-escalate is for people to stop posting.

I get where you’re coming from, but I think this underestimates most of our users quite a bit.

1 Like

Ban gimmick accounts