No idea what you meant here.
Heās posted multiple times today without getting attacked or banned.
1 Like
So why did you say there are no actions possible? You just stated 3 actions we can all take.
People just need to have more tolerance for being unliked and disrespected.
1 Like
okay
This deleted post was not a personal attack.
1 Like
this is bullshit.
Lol.
1 Like
plz knock it off with that.
Thereās nothing to knock off. I legitimately deleted a stupid post that upon further review was not funny. Believe what you want. Maybe change the software so that I can delete a post without leaving a stupid āthis post has been deletedā notification behind since that apparently rustles so many Jimmieās.
Maybe you should just leave stupid posts up so that you can be ridiculed and the community can try to discourage you from making bad posts in the first place.
It does feel like you decided to start posting deletion notes to troll Jbro, since you seem to think he reacts to everything you post. Maybe Jbro should be a mod so he has the power to read your deleted posts.
My perception is that people piling onto Churchill is often started by him failing to source his information. Whether he doesnāt cite out of laziness or because he knows it annoys certain posters, I donāt know, but half the Churchill-centric drama would disappear if he had better posting habits.
That is not why I called Keeed an antivaxxer. I think heās an antivaxxer because heās grossly overstating the risks associated with getting a shot. I also think itās prudent to seek out extra protection even in the case that you have 2 shots and a prior infection.
1 Like
What the hell are you talking about? I said the risk of the booster was very low.
lol, thatās an incredible and deliberate misrepresentation of what you actually said.
1 Like
Go on, show where I dramatically overstated the risks associated with getting a shot.
OK:
Iām not getting the booster because I think that someone in my exact situation (vaccinated with breakthrough infection four months ago) has a miniscule covid risk and that getting a booster probably doesnāt lower that risk all that much and has nonzero risks itself.
Right now, the current risk to someone boosted are enormous compared to the risks of getting a booster (especially given that someone getting a booster would not have had an allergic reaction to the prior shots), and generally weāve seen that the shots are more protective than past infections. Even when we considered 2 shots sufficient, the consistent advice from all experts has been for the previously infected to get two shots.
Sometimes, it feels like heās desperate to catch certain posters in some sort of āgotchaā, as if that would justify the entirety of his posting history.
I also said before that post
I said that my risk from a covid booster is āminiscule,ā which is, Iām sure, something you would agree with. How in the world is that vastly overstating the risk of the booster? And Iām saying that my risk of covid is also miniscule exactly because Iām pro vaccine and think that both the double vaxxed and breakthrough infected and the double vaxxed and boosted have extremely strong protections from serious covid. Thatās a pro-vaccine position, obviously!
Heās dug himself in a hole and has to do a lot of work to undo the reputation that he has earned.
1 Like