LOL Democrats - Tik Tok on the clock, but the party don't stop

https://twitter.com/TylerSnod/status/1541167148973916160?t=J6Pat1sKG9qsvxGtRHD3aA&s=19

5 Likes

LOL had to shovel money to Wall Street, sorry libs

https://twitter.com/davidsirota/status/1541456993809866752?s=21&t=5FyMUDU0ca4racSulEX8fQ

1 Like

At least the heir apparant gets it. Oh wait:

2 Likes

Being shocked about this should be disqualifying for Dem politicians.

2 Likes

they should’ve gone with shockedpikachu.gif as the image instead.

1 Like

As pointed out by ggoreo in the other thread it’s a very misleading headline.

2 Likes

People insisting the Democratic Party is blameless telling me that I’m rich and from Brooklyn is just perfect.

Is there anyone who stans for eDems that doesn’t make six figures?

1 Like

Some of them make 7 or 8 figures as well.

10 Likes

https://twitter.com/ronbrownstein/status/1541520469395771392?s=21&t=0158n34kVXCCZ_NpQ49J_Q

2 Likes

WTF is a “carve out from filibuster”?

Sounds like something the GOP could pull off because it’s meaningless bs but Dems would fail at because of principles.

One time exception so that a particular bill only needs 50+VP.

They’ll never do it.

They really don’t think the GOP remove the filibuster in an instant if they felt it was +ev, do they?

Damn I would’ve bet that coward Chris Coons would never vote to get around the filibuster and enjoyed letting Manchin and Sinema take heat but google me surprised:

January 19, 2022

WASHINGTON — Today, U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, announced in a speech on the Senate floor that he will support a narrow exception to the filibuster to help enact needed voting rights legislation.

1 Like

I mean whatever he signed would’ve been overturned by SCOTUS. After all, they’ve just showed that they’re willing to overturn longstanding federal law to remove rights from groups they hate.

Nothing short of a constitutional amendment would’ve protected abortion from this and there was no way it was gonna pass.

How about the Ukranian conflict though? Trump would obviously not send a single weapon to the guy who refused to do the corruption with him. Would probably openly back Putain.

https://twitter.com/cnnpolitics/status/1541580411368865793?s=21&t=Ke9Ejiwhd-HRn7ltXKpyNg

Nancy is on it guys

https://twitter.com/speakerpelosi/status/1541798442300833794?s=21&t=Ke9Ejiwhd-HRn7ltXKpyNg

https://twitter.com/chriscillizza/status/1541790135364292609?s=21&t=wIPSfyNMaIEwP6AE3fqAig

2 Likes

But we must consider who is more electable in a general election vs a Republican in Chicago.

Stop trying to make “fetch” happen