Joe Rogan

[Yuv]

What do the rest of your parts think?

[6ix]

@Yuv

(post withdrawn by author, will be automatically deleted in 1 hour unless flagged)

POPUPS ENABLED WITHDRAWN POSTS WILL NOT ESCAPE MY GAZE

Yes, everybody should easily understand what I’m saying at all times, barring the universal experience of everybody just fucking up and writing some nonsensical shit .

[6ix]

@Yuv

What do the rest of your parts think?

They think otherwise.

[microbet]

That’s a complicated sentence. It’s not unintelligible or anything, but most people aren’t going to get it if they just skim it like they do most posts. Easier to say it’s “word salad” and move on.

It’s a bit like your post there itself. Objective labels for objective classes is like going Hemmingway with your writing. Well, only insofar as it’s easier. I don’t really agree with what had occurred to you, but I’m not a misanthrope. I think people have been trained to be bad and would be better and less confused if the only rule was “be kind and caring and accepting”.

I don’t expect most people to follow what I’m saying there, not because it’s unintelligible, or they are incapable, but I don’t think most people will think it’s worth the effort. I can say just about anything I want here and it’s like a private message to you and JT and maybe one or two others. How’s it going you all?

[6ix]

@Yuv

This is where i’m havingn trouble understanding the level you’re on. You could easily remove all the jokes, the crossing off, the references, the parts where you meta posts about your own posts, etc etc.

It will make them a lot less enjoyable and will reduce the number of people who keep telling you they like your writing style to zero.

You can’t have it both ways.

This edit is the meat and I almost missed it.

All the jokes and crossing-offs and references and what not aren’t confusing imo and more importantly aren’t meant to be confusing. It’s not like I’m trying to pull a forum poster’s mini-version of James Joyce and troll people by writing a Ulysses and then getting mad when people actually understood the Ulysses and deciding to do a super duper troll and write a Finnegan’s Wake lol suck on that dear reader.

And I’m not trolling you right now. To be 100% honest I made that post to Clovis and went to sleep thinking it was insulting because it was too simplified.

EDITOR’S NOTE: using literary allusions can be construed as being intentionally confusing and it’s wholly subjective as to which will be considered commonplace, so, cliff notes, Joyce was an arrogant hack writer who wrote some, from the horse’s mouth, intentionally confusing epic bullshit.

EDITOR’S NOTE 2: using colloquialisms can be construed as being intentionally confusing and it’s wholly subjective as to which will be considered commonplace, so, “from the horse’s mouth” means Joyce said that damn shit himself.

[Yuv]

I read it, but just because i find 6ix analysis interesting. I’m not following the racism derail.

[6ix]

@cassette

(post withdrawn by author, will be automatically deleted in 1 hour unless flagged)

fuck I only saw Lord Of The Flies

ROGER WAS RIGHT

[6ix]

@microbet

skim it

Taste the soup

[cassette]

It was a dickish post that included a backhanded compliment. We’re going full deontology up in here so I cannot justify the compliment this time, sorry mate.

[6ix]

@cassette

It was a dickish post that included a backhanded compliment. We’re going full deontology up in here so I cannot justify the compliment this time, sorry mate.

It was dickish towards me? We’re going full Royal Rumble up in here?

I always knew Joe Rogan would tear this forum apart.

[Trolly]

What if 6ix writes in a normal fashion we can understand and then we discover he’s actually been a deplorable all this time?

[tabbaker]

Grunching

I thought 6ix was black

[6ix]

eww gross

[Yuv]

Man cassette’s description there can be directed at like 50 posts. I’m so confused.

[6ix]

@Trolly

What if 6ix writes in a normal fashion we can understand and then we discover he’s actually been a deplorable all this time?

Please understand I’m doing this good-naturedly and not trying to start a thing:

@6ix

@Trolly

@6ix

I’ll take the L, making that post right after posting the drone strike cartoon was probably confusing.

That drone cartoon is a masterwork of straight white dudes telling on themselves.

Telling on themselves about what Trolly?

Please don’t pull a Trolly on me tia.

But then you did pull a Trolly on me. My fashion seems totally super normal but maybe you can explain to the class what’s so abnormal about the simple and direct question I asked, that you ignored?

or not, it’s fine, whatev, like I said i’m just goofing around

[6ix]

I appreciated the juxtaposition:

[suzzer99]

https://twitter.com/biruckx/status/1401255113230929922

This is a good example of the Roganbro attitude imo. If you had asked all the guys in my men’s circle - I think most would approve of this tweet.

I follow a podcast called Desert Oracle by some techie-bro who cashed out his chips and lives in the CA desert. He’s generally pretty entertaining but he has this annoying habit of using “science” as a pejorative to lead into stuff like the story of LA stealing water.

It’s completely valid to bash everyone involved with that, and yes science has wreaked a lot of destruction if you cherry pick the failures and skullduggery. But it still has an infinitely better track record than anti-science.

Or he decries that men of science would pooh pooh the Dark Watchers and destroy everything that is good and mysterious in the world.

I can’t stand that attitude out of smart, otherwise non-brain-worm-infected people. You’re basically giving the morons a license to completely discount any scientific fact they don’t want to believe. There’s a way to attack all those things, and still talk about the Dark Watchers, w/o saying science in the same nasally condescending tone that country music songs use for California.

[mosdef]

People don’t like science when science disrupts their emotional and irrational narratives.

[i2i]

The whole “UFO” thing could just be the government hiding new technology like before

C.I.A. Admits Government Lied About U.F.O. Sightings (Published 1997)

[Marksman]

@cassette

It was a dickish post that included a backhanded compliment. We’re going full deontology up in here so I cannot justify the compliment this time, sorry mate.